Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):1175.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08504-2.

Changes in on-time vaccination following the introduction of an electronic immunization registry, Tanzania 2016-2018: interrupted time-series analysis

Affiliations

Changes in on-time vaccination following the introduction of an electronic immunization registry, Tanzania 2016-2018: interrupted time-series analysis

Samantha B Dolan et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Digital health interventions (DHI) have the potential to improve the management and utilization of health information to optimize health care worker performance and provision of care. Despite the proliferation of DHI projects in low-and middle-income countries, few have been evaluated in an effort to understand their impact on health systems and health-related outcomes. Although more evidence is needed on their impact and effectiveness, the use of DHIs among immunization programs has become more widespread and shows promise for improving vaccination uptake and adherence to immunization schedules.

Methods: Our aim was to assess the impact of an electronic immunization registry (EIR) using an interrupted time-series analysis to analyze the effect on proportion of on-time vaccinations following introduction of an EIR in Tanzania. We hypothesized that the introduction of the EIR would lead to statistically significant changes in vaccination timeliness at 3, 6, and > 6 months post-introduction.

Results: For our primary analysis, we observed a decrease in the proportion of on-time vaccinations following EIR introduction. In contrast, our sensitivity analysis estimated improvements in timeliness among those children with complete vaccination records. However, we must emphasize caution interpreting these findings as they are likely affected by implementation challenges.

Conclusions: This study highlights the complexities of using digitized individual-level routine health information system data for evaluation and research purposes. EIRs have the potential to improve vaccination timeliness, but analyses using EIR data can be complicated by data quality issues and inconsistent data entry leading to difficulties interpreting findings.

Keywords: Digital health intervention; Electronic immunisation registry; Interrupted time-series analysis; Routine health information system; Vaccination timeliness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of EIR Introduction. Note: TImR: Tanzania Immunization Registry
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Casual linkage diagram of the relationships and assumptions between implementation of an electronic immunization registry and improved vaccination timeliness
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of children with a documented vaccination and proportion vaccinated on-time by vaccine type and region, Tanzania, November 2016-July 2018* *Red line indicates when the EIR was introduced (approximately); blue line indicates when the SMS reminders were introduced
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Incomplete or missing vaccination records among all children registered in the EIR* *For the selected vaccines of interest and includes doses administered after data pull and doses administered before a date-of-birth, which were removed for the analysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Regression results for primary model* *Red dotted line indicates EIR-introduction date; black dots indicate the average proportion of vaccinations per facility per month with the black lines indicating their associated 95% confidence intervals; blue lines indicate the change in slope for the proportion of children vaccinated on-time per month per facility
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Regression results for sensitivity analysis* *Red dotted line indicates EIR-introduction date; black dots indicate the average proportion of vaccinations per facility per month with the black lines indicating their associated 95% confidence intervals; blue lines indicate the change in slope for the proportion of children vaccinated on-time per month per facility

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. - PubMed
    1. World Health Assembly . Seventy-first world health assembly- digital health, agenda item 12.4. 2018.
    1. The Bellagio eHealth Evaluation Group. Call to action on global eHealth evaluation: consensus statement of the WHO global eHealth evaluation meeting. Bellagio: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Labrique A, Vasudevan L, Weiss W, Wilson K. Establishing standards to evaluate the impact of integrating digital health into health systems. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018;6(Suppl 1):S5–S17. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00230. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dumit EM, Novillo-Ortiz D, Contreras M, Velandia M, Danovaro-Holliday MC. The use of eHealth with immunizations: an overview of systematic reviews. Vaccine. 2018;36(52):7923–7928. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.076. - DOI - PubMed