Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 21;21(1):162.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01053-9.

Views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences: a systematic review

Affiliations

Views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences: a systematic review

Shrikant Atreya et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a pivotal role in providing end-of-life care in the community. Although they value end-of-life care, they have apprehensions about providing care in view of the limitations in knowledge and skills in end-of-life care. This review aimed to explore, synthesise, and analyse the views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences.

Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched for literature on the views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences from 01/01/1990 to 31/05/2021. Methodological quality was reported.

Results: Of the 10,037 articles identified, 23 were included for the review. Five themes developed from the review. The desire to provide palliative care, as well as self-actualisation needs, relevance to practice, a sense of responsibility, and a therapeutic bond, motivates general practitioners to learn end-of-life care. Some of the learning needs expressed were pain and symptom management, communication skills, and addressing caregiver needs. Experiential learning and pragmatist learning styles were preferred learning styles. They perceived the need for an amicable learning environment in which they could freely express their deficiencies. The review also identified barriers to learning, challenges at personal and professional level, feelings of disempowerment, and conflicts in care.

Conclusion: GPs' preference for learning about end-of-life care was influenced by the value attributed to learning, context and content, as well as preference for learning styles and the availability of resources. Thus, future trainings must be in alignment with the GPs' learning preferences.

Keywords: Continuing medical education; End of life care; General practitioner; Motivation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Naveen Salins is an Associate Editor (Palliative care in other conditions) of BMC Palliative Care. Shrikant Atreya and Soumitra Shankar Datta declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram

References

    1. Mitchell GK. How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2002;16(6):457–464. doi: 10.1191/0269216302pm573oa. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mitchell GK, Reymond EJ, McGrath BP. Palliative care: promoting general practice participation. Med J Aust. 2004;180(5):207–208. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05885.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray SA, Boyd K, Sheikh A, Thomas K, Higginson IJ. Developing primary palliative care. BMJ. 2004;329(7474):1056–1057. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7474.1056. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forrest S, Barclay S. Palliative care: a task for everyone. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(539):503. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gott M, Seymour J, Ingleton C, Gardiner C, Bellamy G. 'That's part of everybody's job': the perspectives of health care staff in England and New Zealand on the meaning and remit of palliative care. Palliat Med. 2012;26(3):232–241. doi: 10.1177/0269216311408993. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources