Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 20;15(1):302.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06169-y.

Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined

Tamarinde Haven  1 , Gowri Gopalakrishna  2 , Joeri Tijdink  3   4 , Dorien van der Schot  4 , Lex Bouter  2   4
Affiliations

Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined

Tamarinde Haven et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Proponents of open science often refer to issues pertaining to research integrity and vice versa. In this commentary, we argue that concepts such as responsible research practices, transparency, and open science are connected to one another, but that they each have a different focus. We argue that responsible research practices focus more on the rigorous conduct of research, transparency focuses predominantly on the complete reporting of research, and open science's core focus is mostly about dissemination of research. Doing justice to these concepts requires action from researchers and research institutions to make research with integrity possible, easy, normative, and rewarding. For each of these levels from the Center for Open Science pyramid of behaviour change, we provide suggestions on what researchers and research institutions can do to promote a culture of research integrity. We close with a brief reflection on initiatives by other research communities and stakeholders and make a call to those working in the fields of research integrity and open science to pay closer attention to one other's work.

Keywords: Open science; Research integrity; Responsible research practices; Transparency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intertwined concepts of responsible research practices, transparency, open science and their foci. This Venn diagram illustrates how the different concepts interrelate to make research more traceable and verifiable, with the aim to increase trust in research and researchers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Levelt Committee, Noort Committee, Drenth Committee. Flawed science: The fraudulent research practices of social psychologist Diederik Stapel. 2012.
    1. Baker M. 1500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533(7604):452–454. doi: 10.1038/533452a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences Engineering, and Medicine. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); May 7, 2019. 10.17226/25303. - PubMed
    1. Goodman SN, Fanelli D, Ioannidis JP. What does research reproducibility mean? Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(341):341. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kozlov M. NIH issues a seismic mandate: share data publicly. Nature. 2022;602(7898):558–559. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00402-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources