Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 16:36:36.
doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.36. eCollection 2022.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Affiliations

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Mohsen Abbasi et al. Med J Islam Repub Iran. .

Abstract

Background: It is important to have a rapid and cost-effective laboratory test for the early diagnosis of respiratory diseases.The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of rapid tests and PCR in patients with suspected influenza. Methods: This study was a cost-effectiveness analysis from a community perspective that in which patients who were referred to the emergency department of selected hospitals of IUMS university with suspected respiratory symptoms of influenza were studied by convenience sampling method. The intervention and comparator were rapid tests and PCR respectively. effectiveness indicators in this study include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of both tests, and it examines costs from a community perspective. After drawing the decision tree model in the TreeAge software, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and to evaluate the strength of the analysis results, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses on all cost and effectiveness parameters were used. Results: According to the findings of this study, the effectiveness index in rapid test and PCR is equal to 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, and the average cost of the two tests is equal to 62.157 and 201.37$, respectively, the ICERwas 25450.27 and the cost-effectiveness threshold was estimated equal to 6000 according to the per capita GDP of the country. One-way and two-way sensitivity analysis showed that the result of cost-effectiveness analysis did not change, and the rapid test is cost-effective. Conclusion: Rapid test is less costly and effective than PCR, but the cost difference is greater than the difference in effectiveness and in terms of effectiveness indicators, both diagnostic tests are almost similar, and this cost difference has led to the choice of the rapid test as a cost-effective option. Therefore, it is recommended that physicians prioritize rapid tests in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases.

Keywords: Cost-Effectiveness; PCR; Rapid Test; Respiratory Infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1334–49. - PubMed
    1. Shinya K, Ebina M, Yamada S, Ono M, Kasai N, Kawaoka Y. Avian flu: influenza virus receptors in the human airway. Nature. 2006;440(7083):435. - PubMed
    1. Zell R, Krumbholz A, Eitner A, Krieg R, Halbhuber K-J, Wutzler P. Prevalence of PB1-F2 of influenza A viruses. J Gen Virol. 2007;88(2):536–46. - PubMed
    1. Macias AE, McElhaney JE, Chaves SS, Nealon J, Nunes MC, Samson SI, et al. The disease burden of influenza beyond respiratory illness. Vaccine. 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hueston WJ, Benich JJ. A cost-benefit analysis of testing for influenza A in high-risk adults. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(1):33–40. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources