Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;37(12):2272-2281.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.16005. Epub 2022 Oct 9.

Endoscopic radial incision versus endoscopic balloon dilation as initial treatments of benign esophageal anastomotic stricture

Affiliations

Endoscopic radial incision versus endoscopic balloon dilation as initial treatments of benign esophageal anastomotic stricture

Zhao-Chao Zhang et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background and aim: We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic radial incision (ERI) versus endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) treatment of naïve, recurrent, and refractory benign esophageal anastomotic strictures.

Methods: One hundred and one ERI, 145 EBD, and 42 ERI combined with EBD sessions were performed in 136 consecutive patients with benign esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy at Zhongshan Hospital from January 2016 to August 2021. Baseline characteristics, operational procedures, and clinical outcomes data were retrospectively evaluated. Parameters and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between ERI and EBD in patients with naïve or recurrent or refractory strictures. Risk factors for re-stricture after ERI were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Twenty-nine ERI versus 68 EBD sessions were performed for naïve stricture, 26 ERI versus 60 EBD for recurrent strictures, and 46 ERI versus 17 EBD for refractory stricture. With comparable baseline characteristics, RFS was greater in the ERI than the EBD group for naïve strictures (P = 0.0449). The ERI group had a lower 12-month re-stricture rate than the EBD group (37.9% vs 61.8%, P = 0.0309) and a more prolonged patency time (181.5 ± 263.1 vs 74.5 ± 82.0, P = 0.0233). Between the two interventions, recurrent and refractory strictures had similar RFS (P = 0.0598; P = 0.7668). Multivariate analysis revealed initial ERI treatment was an independent predictive factor for lower re-stricture risk after ERI intervention (odds ratio = 0.047, P = 0.001). Few adverse events were observed after ERI or EBD (3.0% vs 2.1%, P = 0.6918).

Conclusions: ERI is associated with lower re-stricture rates with better patency and RFS compared with EBD for naive strictures.

Keywords: benign esophageal anastomotic strictures; endoscopic balloon dilation; endoscopic radial incision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Honkoop P, Siersema PD, Tilanus HW, Stassen LPS, Hop WCJ, van Blankenstein M. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1996; 111: 1141-1146 discussion 1147-8.
    1. Heitmiller RF, Fischer A, Liddicoat JR. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis: results following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Dis. Esophagus 1999; 12: 264-269.
    1. Siersema PD. Treatment options for esophageal strictures. Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008; 5: 142-152.
    1. Siersema PD. How to Approach a Patient With Refractory or Recurrent Benign Esophageal Stricture. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 7-10.
    1. Sami SS, Haboubi HN, Ang Y et al. UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 2018; 67: 1000-1023.

LinkOut - more resources