Continuing specialist care into adulthood in young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records in England
- PMID: 36135794
- PMCID: PMC10152295
- DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac497
Continuing specialist care into adulthood in young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records in England
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Continuing specialist care into adulthood in young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records in England.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Jun 1;62(6):2330. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead005. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023. PMID: 36629489 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to measure (1) the proportion of children who continue to receive specialist care (rheumatology/ophthalmology) as adults, (2) the characteristics associated with continuing specialist care, and (3) the frequency of specialist care appointments in both paediatric and adult services.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of young people with JIA was identified from UK primary care electronic health records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2018. To be included in the study, cases needed to have at least 1 year of registration at their general practice beyond age 18 and linkage to Hospital Episodes Statistics data for secondary care information. All specialist care outpatient visits were identified from Hospital Episodes Statistics outpatient data.
Results: There were 666 young people included in the study. Of these, 427 (64%) received specialist care beyond age 18, 90 (13%) had their last recorded contact at 16-17 years and 149 (22%) did not continue after 16 years. Older age at diagnosis, female gender, less deprivation and a childhood diagnosis of uveitis were associated with continuing specialist care beyond age 18. Of those continuing beyond 18, 35% (n = 153) were subsequently discharged by the study end date. Of all those discharged, 32% had a missed appointment recorded after the last attended visit, suggesting failure to attend.
Conclusions: Two-thirds of young people with JIA continue to receive specialist care beyond age 18. This is useful information for children and young people with JIA and their families planning for their future, and for clinicians planning health-care services.
Keywords: JIA; adolescent medicine; epidemiology; healthcare utilization; outcomes research.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Figures




References
-
- Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P. et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol 2004;31:390–2. - PubMed
-
- Zak M, Pedersen FK.. Juvenile chronic arthritis into adulthood: a long‐term follow‐up study. Rheumatology 2000;39:198–204. - PubMed
-
- Oen K, Malleson PN, Cabral DA. et al. Disease course and outcome of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in a multicenter cohort. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1989–99. - PubMed
-
- Koivuniemi R, Leirisalo-Repo M.. Juvenile chronic arthritis in adult life: a study of long-term outcome in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis or adult rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 1999;18:220–6. - PubMed
-
- Selvaag AM, Aulie HA, Lilleby V. et al. Disease progression into adulthood and predictors of long-term active disease in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:190–5. - PubMed