Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 7;43(46):4777-4788.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac470.

Sex differences in arterial hypertension

Affiliations
Review

Sex differences in arterial hypertension

Eva Gerdts et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

There is strong evidence that sex chromosomes and sex hormones influence blood pressure (BP) regulation, distribution of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and co-morbidities differentially in females and males with essential arterial hypertension. The risk for CV disease increases at a lower BP level in females than in males, suggesting that sex-specific thresholds for diagnosis of hypertension may be reasonable. However, due to paucity of data, in particularly from specifically designed clinical trials, it is not yet known whether hypertension should be differently managed in females and males, including treatment goals and choice and dosages of antihypertensive drugs. Accordingly, this consensus document was conceived to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge on sex differences in essential hypertension including BP development over the life course, development of hypertension, pathophysiologic mechanisms regulating BP, interaction of BP with CV risk factors and co-morbidities, hypertension-mediated organ damage in the heart and the arteries, impact on incident CV disease, and differences in the effect of antihypertensive treatment. The consensus document also highlights areas where focused research is needed to advance sex-specific prevention and management of hypertension.

Keywords: Adverse events; Blood Pressure regulators; Cardiovascular disease; Hypertension; Hypertension-mediated organ damage; Pharmacological treatment; Sex; Sex hormones.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: E.G.: Bayer Health, NOKLUS, Fürst laboratories; I.S. Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankio, Medtronic, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, Recordati, Sanofi and Servier; SB Daiichi Sankyo; Merck, Sanofi, Menarini and Servier; C.B. Menarini Corporate, Servier, Novo Nordisk and Novartis; R.M.B. Medtronic; C.C.: none; V.C.: none; F.D.: none; M.F.: none; T.K.: TK Medtronics, and ReCor Medical; M.L.L.: Bayer Health, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer; AHEMM: Organon, Novartis, Abbott and Omron; F.M.: Medtronic, ReCor Medical, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, Boerhringer-Ingelheim, Medtronic, Merck and ReCor Medical; A.S.M.: Servier and SCAI; T.M.: none; G.P.: none; G.d.S.: none.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Sex differences in hypertension. BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; T2D, type 2 diabetes; OSAS, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; LV, left ventricular; LA left atrial; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; BB, beta blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Blood pressure development in females and males during childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood. Based upon O’Keeffe et al., Shen et al., and Ji et al..
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sex differences in development of arterial dysfunction and related complications. Red arrows indicate mechanisms that are enhanced in females. MBP, mean arterial blood pressure; PP, pulse pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; AF, atrial fibrillation; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; NO, nitric oxide; SNS, sympathetic nervous system.

References

    1. GBD 2013 Risk Factors Collaborators, Forouzanfar MH, Alexander L, Anderson HR, Bachman VF, Biryukov S, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet 2015;386:2287–2323. - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators . Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 2020;396:1223–1249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bartz D, Chitnis T, Kaiser UB, Rich-Edwards JW, Rexrode KM, Pennell PB, et al. Clinical advances in sex- and gender-informed medicine to improve the health of all: A review. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:574–583. - PubMed
    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) . Long-term and recent trends in hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in 12 high-income countries: an analysis of 123 nationally representative surveys. Lancet 2019;394:639–651. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang BY, Qian Z, Howard SW, Vaughn MG, Fan SJ, Liu KK, et al. Global association between ambient air pollution and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Pollut 2018;235:576–588. - PubMed