Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2022 Sep 22;15(9):e250584.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2022-250584.

Laparoscopic myomectomy to facilitate laparoscopic resection of a bleeding interstitial ectopic pregnancy

Affiliations
Case Reports

Laparoscopic myomectomy to facilitate laparoscopic resection of a bleeding interstitial ectopic pregnancy

Anna Alexandra McDougall et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Interstitial pregnancies present a diagnostic and management challenge and are associated with significant bleeding risk. We present a case of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy where there was a diagnostic delay due to the presence of uterine fibroids and where a laparoscopic myomectomy was required in order to perform laparoscopic resection of the ruptured interstitial pregnancy.This case demonstrates the possibilities at laparoscopy for ectopic pregnancy, highlights the benefit of a structured 'buddy' system between gynaecology surgeons and brings attention to the paucity of literature on the unique management challenges of ectopic pregnancy in the presence of leiomyoma.

Keywords: Pregnancy; Reproductive medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Laparoscopic images. (A) Haemoperitoneum (B) fetus of approximately 12 weeks gestation seen in the abdominal cavity arising from the ruptured cornua (C) 6 cm fibroid removed at myomectomy to facilitate access to the cornua allowing salpingectomy and cornuostomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Initial trans-vaginal ultrasound images suggestive of an ‘intrauterine’ pregnancy.

References

    1. Alalade AO, Smith FJE, Kendall CE, et al. . Evidence-Based management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. J Obstet Gynaecol 2017;37:982–91. 10.1080/01443615.2017.1323852 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paterson K, Odejinmi F, Shahid A. Clinical dilemmas and risks of misdiagnosis and mismanagement associated with endogenous caesarean scar pregnancy: a case series and literature review. Glob J Reprod Med 2017;3:555602.
    1. Kirk E, Papageorghiou AT, Condous G, et al. . The diagnostic effectiveness of an initial transvaginal scan in detecting ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2824–8. 10.1093/humrep/dem283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Odejinmi F, Rizzuto I, Oliver R, et al. . Beyond guidelines: effectiveness of a programme in achieving operative laparoscopy for all women requiring surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2015;80:46–53. 10.1159/000371763 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ESHRE Working group on ectopic pregnancy, Kirk E, Ankum P, Jakab a, et al. terminology for describing normally sited and ectopic pregnancies on ultrasound: ESHRE recommendations for good practice. Hum Reprod Open 2020;16:hoaa055. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types