Bipolar Electroporation Across the Interventricular Septum: Electrophysiological, Imaging, and Histopathological Characteristics
- PMID: 36137715
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.06.002
Bipolar Electroporation Across the Interventricular Septum: Electrophysiological, Imaging, and Histopathological Characteristics
Abstract
Background: Pulsed electric field (PEF) ablation is an emerging modality for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Data regarding effects on the interventricular septum are limited, and the optimal delivery protocol and electrode configuration remain undefined.
Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the electrophysiological, imaging, and histological characteristics of bipolar direct-current PEF delivered across the interventricular septum.
Methods: PEF was applied between identical solid-tip ablation catheters positioned on either side of the septum in a chronic canine model. Intracardiac and surface electrophysiological data were recorded following delivery. In 4 animals, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed early (6 ± 2 days) and late (30 ± 2 days) postablation. After 4 weeks of survival, cardiac specimens were sectioned for histopathological analysis.
Results: In 8 canines, PEF was delivered in 27 separate septal sites (45 ± 17 J/site) with either microsecond or nanosecond PEF. Acute complications included transient complete atrioventricular block in 5 animals (63%) after delivery at the anterobasal septum, with right bundle branch block persisting in 3 (38%). Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 1 animal during microsecond but not nanosecond PEF. Postprocedural CMR showed prominent edema and significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction, which recovered with late imaging. At 4 weeks, 36 individual well-demarcated lesions were demonstrated by CMR and histopathology. Lesion depth measured by histology was 2.6 ± 2.1 mm (maximum 10.9 mm and near transmural).
Conclusions: Bipolar PEF ablation of the interventricular septum is feasible and can produce near transmural lesions. Myocardial stunning, edema, and conduction system injury may occur transiently. Further studies are required to optimize safe delivery and efficacious lesions.
Keywords: electroporation; pulsed electric fields; pulsed field ablation; ventricular ablation.
Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Funding for this work was provided through benefactor endowment to the Mayo Clinic Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and intramural funding (awarded to Dr Asirvatham). Drs Tri, Desimone, Killu, Maor, and Asirvatham have intellectual property claims involving the techniques used in this study. Mrs Danitz and Uecker are employed by Pulse Biosciences Inc, the manufacturer of the nanosecond pulse generator used in this study. Dr Asirvatham has received speaking/honoraria from Abbott, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Zoll. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Ablating Deep Septal Substrates: Will the Answer Be Bipolar Electroporation?JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;8(9):1119-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.07.022. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 36137716 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources