Redefining effect modification
- PMID: 36138553
- DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12495
Redefining effect modification
Abstract
The odds ratio (OR) has been misunderstood in evidence based medicine and clinical epidemiology. Currently, "noncollapsibility" is considered a problem with interpretation of the OR and it is thought that the OR is rarely the parameter of interest for causal inference or interpretation of effect modification. The current focus on the relative risk (RR) and risk difference (RD) suffers from an important limitation: they are not solely measures of effect and vary numerically with baseline risk. In this paper, generalized linear models are examined in terms of the three binary effect measures commonly used in epidemiology to demonstrate that ORs may be the only way to interpret effect modification and have properties that should make them the parameter of interest for causal inference. We look forward to discussion, debate, and counter-views on this issue from the epidemiology community.
Keywords: effect modification; noncollapsibility; odds ratio.
© 2022 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio "portable" in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model.J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;142:280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 34384876 Free PMC article.
-
Studying noncollapsibility of the odds ratio with marginal structural and logistic regression models.Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Oct;25(5):1925-1937. doi: 10.1177/0962280213505804. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016. PMID: 24108272
-
Definition and identification of causal ratio effects.Psychol Methods. 2024 Dec 12. doi: 10.1037/met0000711. Online ahead of print. Psychol Methods. 2024. PMID: 39666541
-
[Causal inference in medicine--a historical view in epidemiology].Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1996 Jul;51(2):558-68. doi: 10.1265/jjh.51.558. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1996. PMID: 8783873 Review. Japanese.
-
The relation of collapsibility and confounding to faithfulness and stability.Epidemiology. 2015 Jul;26(4):466-72. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000291. Epidemiology. 2015. PMID: 25867114 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Greenland S. Effect modification and interaction. In: Balakrishnan N, Colton T, Everitt B, Piegorsch W, Ruggeri F, Teugels JL, eds. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Wiley; 2014. doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat03728 (Last accessed 19 May 2022)
-
- Bours MJL. Tutorial: a nontechnical explanation of the counterfactual definition of effect modification and interaction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:113-124.
-
- Doi SA, Furuya-Kanamori L, Xu C, Lin L, Chivese T, Thalib L. Controversy and debate: questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: paper 1: a call for change to practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;142:271-279.
-
- Hernán MA, Robins JM. Causal Inference: What If. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2020:42.
-
- Greenland S, Robins JM, Pearl J. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat Sci. 1999;14:29-46.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous