Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):1362.
doi: 10.3390/children9091362.

Audiological Risk Factors, Referral Rates and Dropouts: 9 Years of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in North Sardinia

Affiliations

Audiological Risk Factors, Referral Rates and Dropouts: 9 Years of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening in North Sardinia

Laura Maria De Luca et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Objectives of the present work were to analyze the prevalence of hearing loss in our population of screened newborns during the first 9 years of the universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program at University Hospital Sassari (Italy) (AOU Sassari), to analyze the risk factors involved, and to analyze our effectiveness in terms of referral rates and dropout rates. Methods: Monocentric retrospective study whose target population included all the newborns born or referred to our hospital between 2011 and 2019. Results: From 2011 to 2019, a total of 11,688 babies were enrolled in our screening program. In total, 3.9‱ of wellborn babies and 3.58% of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) babies had some degree of hearing loss. The most frequently observed risk factors among non-NICU babies were family history of hearing loss (3.34%) and craniofacial anomalies (0.16%), among NICU babies were low birth weight (54.91%) and prematurity (24.33%). In the multivariate analysis, family history of hearing loss (p < 0.001), NICU (p < 0.001), craniofacial anomalies (p < 0.001), low birth weight (<1500 g) (p = 0.04) and HIV (p = 0.03) were confirmed as risk factors. Conclusions: Our data are largely consistent with the literature and most results were expected, one relevant exception being the possible role of NICU as a confounding factor and the limited number of risk factors confirmed in the multivariate analysis.

Keywords: hearing loss; neonatal screening; otoacoustic emissions; risk factors; unilateral hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of our screening protocol.

References

    1. Korver A.M.H., Smith R.J.H., Van Camp G., Schleiss M.R., Bitner-Glindzicz M.A.K., Lustig L.R., Usami S.-I., Boudewyns A.N. Congenital Hearing Loss. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3:16094. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.94. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoshinaga-Itano C., Sedey A.L., Wiggin M., Mason C.A. Language Outcomes Improved Through Early Hearing Detection and Earlier Cochlear Implantation. Otol. Neurotol. 2018;39:1256–1263. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001976. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs. Pediatrics. 2007;120:898–921. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2333. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wroblewska-Seniuk K.E., Dabrowski P., Szyfter W., Mazela J. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: Methods and Results, Obstacles, and Benefits. Pediatr. Res. 2017;81:415–422. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.250. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vohr B.R., Oh W., Stewart E.J., Bentkover J.D., Gabbard S., Lemons J., Papile L.A., Pye R. Comparison of Costs and Referral Rates of 3 Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Protocols. J. Pediatr. 2001;139:238–244. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.115971. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources