A Geometric Morphometric Study on Sexual Dimorphism in Viscerocranium
- PMID: 36138812
- PMCID: PMC9495862
- DOI: 10.3390/biology11091333
A Geometric Morphometric Study on Sexual Dimorphism in Viscerocranium
Abstract
The level of sexual dimorphism manifested by human bones is an important factor for development of effective sex estimation methods. The aim of the study was to investigate the sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the viscerocranium using geometric morphometric techniques. It also aimed to explore the sex differences in distinct viscerocranial regions and to establish the most dimorphic region with regard to size and shape. Computed tomography images of 156 males and 184 females were used in the study. Three-dimensional coordinates of 31 landmarks were acquired. Five landmark configurations were constructed from the viscerocranium and its orbital, nasal, maxillary, and zygomatic region. Generalized Procrustes superimposition, principal component analysis, and discriminant analysis were applied to each configuration. The significance of the sex differences in size and shape was assessed and significant differences were found in all configurations. The highest accuracy was obtained from both shape and size of the whole viscerocranium. Based on size only, the highest accuracy was achieved by the nasal region. The accuracy based on shape was generally low for all configurations, but the highest result was attained by the orbital region. Hence, size is a better sex discriminator than shape.
Keywords: 3D landmarks; computed tomography; geometric morphometrics; sexual dimorphism; viscerocranium.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Sexual dimorphism in shape and size of the neurocranium.Int J Legal Med. 2022 Nov;136(6):1851-1863. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02876-0. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Int J Legal Med. 2022. PMID: 35945460
-
Size and shape of human mandible: Sex differences and influence of age on sex estimation accuracy.Leg Med (Tokyo). 2023 Nov;65:102322. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102322. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2023. PMID: 37722156
-
A Geometric Morphometrics Approach for Sex Estimation Based on the Orbital Region of Human Skulls from Bosnian Population.Scanning. 2023 Apr 14;2023:2223138. doi: 10.1155/2023/2223138. eCollection 2023. Scanning. 2023. PMID: 37089258 Free PMC article.
-
[Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].Zh Obshch Biol. 2002 Nov-Dec;63(6):473-93. Zh Obshch Biol. 2002. PMID: 12510587 Review. Russian.
-
The Inappropriate Symmetries of Multivariate Statistical Analysis in Geometric Morphometrics.Evol Biol. 2016;43:277-313. doi: 10.1007/s11692-016-9382-7. Epub 2016 Apr 18. Evol Biol. 2016. PMID: 27512236 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Midface Skeletal Sexual Dimorphism: Lessons Learned from Advanced Three-dimensional Imaging in the White Population.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 9;12(10):e6215. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006215. eCollection 2024 Oct. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39386100 Free PMC article.
-
Current State of Knowledge Regarding the Treatment of Cranial Bone Defects: An Overview.Materials (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;18(9):2021. doi: 10.3390/ma18092021. Materials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40363522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enhancing Sex Estimation Accuracy with Cranial Angle Measurements and Machine Learning.Biology (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;13(10):780. doi: 10.3390/biology13100780. Biology (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39452089 Free PMC article.
-
Dimensions and position of the eye for facial approximations in a South African cone beam computed tomography sample.J Forensic Sci. 2025 Mar;70(2):446-459. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15693. Epub 2024 Dec 23. J Forensic Sci. 2025. PMID: 39715721 Free PMC article.
-
Sex estimation techniques based on skulls in forensic anthropology: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0311762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311762. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39652615 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Frayer D.W., Wolpoff M.H. Sexual Dimorphism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 1985;14:429–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185.002241. - DOI
-
- Stinson S. Sex differences in environmental sensitivity during growth and development. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1985;28:123–147. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330280507. - DOI
-
- Jantz L.M. The meaning and consequences of morphological variation; Proceedings of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL, USA. 21 November 2003; Arlington, VA, USA: American Anthropological Association; 2004. pp. 1–17.
-
- Zavando M.D.A., Suazo G.I.C., Smith R.L. Sexual dimorphism determination from the lineal dimensions of skulls. Int. J. Morphol. 2009;27:133–137. doi: 10.4067/S0717-95022009000100024. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources