Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 6;19(18):11160.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811160.

Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review

Affiliations

Use of Patient-Reported Data within the Acute Healthcare Context: A Scoping Review

Kathryn Kynoch et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient satisfaction surveys provide important information on how care can be improved. However, data collection does not always translate to changes in practice or service delivery. This scoping review aimed to collect, map and report on the use of collected patient-reported data used within acute healthcare contexts for improvement to care or processes. Using JBI methods, an extensive search was undertaken of multiple health databases and trial registries for published and unpublished studies. The concepts of interest included the types and characteristics of published patient experience and PROMs research, with a specific focus on the ways in which data have been applied to clinical practice. Barriers and facilitators to the use of collected data were also explored. From 4057 records, 86 papers were included. Most research was undertaken in North America, Canada or the UK. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems tool (HCAHPS) was used most frequently for measuring patient satisfaction. Where reported, data were applied to improve patient-centred care and utilization of health resources. Gaps in the use of patient data within hospital services are noticeable. Engaging management and improving staff capability are needed to overcome barriers to implementation.

Keywords: PREMs; PROMs; patient satisfaction; patient-reported data; patient-reported experience; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of the study selection and inclusion process [15].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographical distribution of the included papers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Study settings/contexts (n = 79).

References

    1. Doyle C., Lennox L., Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001570. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Qual. Life Res. 2009;18:115–123. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gleeson H., Calderon A., Swami V., Deighton J., Wolpert M., Edbrooke-Childs J. Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011907. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wiering B., de Boer D., Delnoij D. Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: A scoping review. Health Expect. 2017;20:11–23. doi: 10.1111/hex.12442. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishaque S., Karnon J., Chen G., Nair R., Salter A.B. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient reported outcomes (PROMs) Qual. Life Res. 2019;28:567–592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2016-z. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources