A Kirkpatrick Model Process Evaluation of Reactions and Learning from My Strengths Training for Life™
- PMID: 36141592
- PMCID: PMC9517080
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811320
A Kirkpatrick Model Process Evaluation of Reactions and Learning from My Strengths Training for Life™
Abstract
Underpinned by the New World Kirkpatrick model, and in the context of a community-based sport psychology programme (My Strengths Training for Life™) for young people experiencing homelessness, this process evaluation investigated (1) young peoples' reactions (i.e., program and facilitator evaluation, enjoyment, attendance, and engagement) and learning (i.e., mental skills and transfer intention), (2) the relationship between reaction and learning variables, and (3) the mediators underpinning this relationship. A total of 301 young people living in a West Midlands housing service completed questionnaires on demographics and reaction and learning variables. Higher levels of programme engagement were positively associated with more favourable reactions to the programme. Enjoyment positively predicted learning outcomes, which was mediated by transfer intention. Recommendations are made for (1) a balance between rigor and flexibility for evaluation methods with disadvantaged youth, (2) including engagement as well as attendance as indicators of meaningful programme participation, (3) measuring programme experiences (e.g., enjoyment) to understand programme effectiveness, and (4) providing opportunities for skill transfer during and after programme participation. Our findings have implications for researchers, programme commissioners, and policymakers designing and evaluating programmes in community-based settings.
Keywords: community-based research; disadvantaged youth; engagement; mental skills training; positive youth development; young people experiencing homelessness.
Conflict of interest statement
St. Basils was the community partner in this research, and was involved in the development and delivery of the MST4Life™ program. The funders had no role in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Gwadz M., Freeman R.M., Kutnick A.H., Silverman E., Ritchie A.S., Cleland C.M., Leonard N.R., Srinagesh A., Powlovich J., Bolas J. Do programs for runaway and homeless youth work? A qualitative exploration from the perspectives of youth clients in diverse settings. Front. Public Health. 2018;6:112. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Homeless Link Young and Homeless. [(accessed on 2 August 2020)]. Available online: https://homeless.org.uk/knowledge-hub/young-and-homeless-2021/
-
- Lerner R.M., Wang J., Chase P.A., Gutierrez A.S., Harris E.M., Rubin R.O., Yalin C. Using relational developmental systems theory to link program goals, activities, and outcomes: The sample case of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. New Dir. Youth Dev. 2014;144:17–30. doi: 10.1002/yd.20110. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boneveski B., Randell M., Paul C., Chapman K., Twyman L., Bryant J., Brozek I., Hughes C. Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
