Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11386.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811386.

Indoor Mobility, Frailty, and Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mediation Model

Paolo Riccardo Brustio  1   2   3 , Anna Mulasso  1   4 , Samuel D'Emanuele  2 , Gianluca Zia  5 , Luca Feletti  6 , Susanna Del Signore  5 , Alberto Rainoldi  1   4
Affiliations

Indoor Mobility, Frailty, and Disability in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mediation Model

Paolo Riccardo Brustio et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The general population, but especially older adults, were forced or encouraged to stay home during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, indoor mobility (IM, the number of steps performed daily at home) may be informative about the general health status of older adults. The present study aimed at evaluating the relationship between IM, frailty (loss of functional reserve including both physical and psychosocial domains), and disability (loss of autonomy measured as activities of daily life, ADLs) in a sample of community-dwelling Italian older adults. Specifically, the primary objective was to investigate IM and disability differences between robust and frail older adults. The secondary objective was to test if frailty is in the causal sequence between IM and disability, i.e., as a mediator in their relationship. Thirty-two participants (mean age = 70 ± 6 years; 56.2% women) were recruited. Frailty and disability were evaluated using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale, respectively. IM at home was measured via an Adamo wristwatch (a connected accelerometer). One-way analyses of covariance, controlling for age and gender, showed that robust participants, classified according to a score higher than five points in the Tilburg Frailty Indicator, performed significantly more IM (F1,28 = 4.639; p = 0.04) and presented lower disability grade than frail ones (F1,28 = 4.342; p =0.046). Only physical frailty was a mediator in the relationship between IM and disability (F2,29 = 8.538, p < 0.001), with a fully mediated model (z = -2.073, p < 0.04). Conversely, the total frailty score was not a mediator in the same relationship, but with IM accounted for the variance in disability (F2,29 = 8.538, p < 0.001; R2 = 33.7%). Our results suggested that frail older adults restricted their IM more and presented a higher level of disability compared to robust older adults. Moreover, data suggest that IM reduction may have a negative impact on physical frailty and indirectly increase disability.

Keywords: ADL; Adamo; active living; aged population; physical activity; physical frailty; walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. At the time the study was conducted L.F. and G.Z. were respectively employee and consultant of Caretek s.r.l.. The company had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mediation model among GARS (outcome), IM (predictor), and Physical TFI (mediator). Notes: Sobel test: z = −2.073, p < 0.04; * denotes p < 0.05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lutz W., Sanderson W., Scherbov S. The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature. 2008;451:716–719. doi: 10.1038/nature06516. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cesari M., Prince M., Thiyagarajan J.A., De Carvalho I.A., Bernabei R., Chan P., Gutierrez-Robledo L.M., Michel J.P., Morley J.E., Ong P., et al. Frailty: An Emerging Public Health Priority. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2016;17:188–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clegg A., Young J., Iliffe S., Rikkert M.O., Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013;381:752–762. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried L.P., Tangen C.M., Walston J., Newman A.B., Hirsch C., Gottdiener J., Seeman T., Tracy R., Kop W.J., Burke G., et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canevelli M., Cesari M., van Kan G.A. Frailty and cognitive decline: How do they relate? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2015;18:43–50. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000133. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types