Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 17;19(18):11740.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811740.

Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion Reference Values in Non-Injured Youth Federated Basketball Players: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion Reference Values in Non-Injured Youth Federated Basketball Players: A Cross-Sectional Study

Cristina Adillón et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

(1) Background: The aim of the present study was to establish ankle joint dorsiflexion reference values among youth federated basketball players. (2) Methods: Cross-sectional study. The participants were basketball players who belonged to youth basketball developmental teams (female and male) from under-12 (U12) to under-17 (U17) categories. Ankle joint dorsiflexion range of motion was evaluated with the weight-bearing lunge test through the Leg Motion system. The distance achieved was recorded in centimeters. (3) Results: 693 basketball players who met the eligibility criteria and volunteered to participate were included in the study. The mean (SD) of ankle joint dorsiflexion was 10.68 (2.44) cm and the reference values were: excessive hypomobility < 6.09 (0.54) cm; hypomobility 6.09 (0.88) cm-8.43 (0.77) cm; normal 8.44 (0.77)-13.11 (0.79) cm; hypermobility 13.11 (0.74)-15.44 (0.86) cm; and excessive hypermobility >15.44 (0.86) cm. (4) Conclusions: This study provides ankle joint dorsiflexion reference values in youth basketball players from 12 to under 17 years old.

Keywords: adolescent; ankle; basketball; pediatrics; range of motion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The LegMotion system, (B) Weight-bearing lunge test, conducted using the LegMotion system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Differences in ankle joint dorsiflexion between dominant leg/nondominant leg.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hall S.J. Basic Biomechanics. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; New York, NY, USA: 2015.
    1. Powden C.J., Hoch J.M., Hoch M.C. Reliability and minimal detectable change of the weight-bearing lunge test: A systematic review. Man. Ther. 2015;20:524–532. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terada M., Pietrosimone B.G., Gribble P.A. Therapeutic Interventions for Increasing Ankle Dorsiflexion After Ankle Sprain: A Systematic Review. J. Athl. Train. 2013;48:696–709. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.4.11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaulerin J., Chorin F., Emile M., D’Arripe-Longue-Ville F., Colson S.S. Ankle Sprains Risk Factors in a Sample of French Firefighters: A Preliminary Prospective Study. J. Sport Rehabil. 2020;29:608–615. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trojian T., Tucker A.K. Plantar Fasciitis. Am. Fam. Physician. 2019;99:744–750. - PubMed