Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep 17;19(18):11749.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811749.

Verbal Autopsy as a Tool for Defining Causes of Death in Specific Healthcare Contexts: Study of Applicability through a Traditional Literature Review

Affiliations
Review

Verbal Autopsy as a Tool for Defining Causes of Death in Specific Healthcare Contexts: Study of Applicability through a Traditional Literature Review

Paolo Bailo et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Autopsy examination, the gold standard for defining causes of death, is often difficult to apply in certain health care settings, especially in developing countries. The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated difficulties in terms of implementing autopsy examinations have made the need for alternative means of determining causes of death even more evident. One of the most interesting alternatives to the conventional autopsy is the verbal autopsy, a tool that originated in Africa and Asia in the 1950s and consists of a structured interview with the deceased's family members concerning the symptoms manifested by the person and the circumstances of death. In the early 1990s, the first doubts emerged about the validity of verbal autopsies, especially about the real reliability of the cause of death identified through this tool. The objective of the review was to identify studies that had assayed the validity of verbal autopsies through a rigorous comparison of the results that emerged from it with the results of conventional autopsies. When starting from an initial pool of 256 articles, only 2 articles were selected for final review. These are the only two original research articles in which a verbal autopsy validation process was performed by employing the full diagnostic autopsy as the gold standard. The two papers reached opposite conclusions, one suggesting adequate validity of verbal autopsy in defining the cause of death and the other casting serious doubts on the real applicability of this tool. Verbal autopsy undoubtedly has extraordinary potential, especially in the area of health and demographic surveillance, even considering the implementation that could result from the use of artificial intelligence and deep learning. However, at present, there appears to be a lack of solid data to support the robust reliability of this tool in defining causes of death.

Keywords: cause of death; complementary methodology; morbid condition; pandemic; verbal autopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Review search strategy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mikkelsen L., Phillips D.E., AbouZahr C., Setel P.W., de Savigny D., Lozano R., Lopez D.L. A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: Monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet. 2015;386:1395–1406. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60171-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waters B.L. Handbook of Autopsy Practice. 4th ed. Springer-Verlag; New York, NY, USA: 2009. pp. 3–7.
    1. Madea B., Argo A. Handbook of Forensic Medicine. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2014. Certification of death: External postmortem examination; pp. 57–74.
    1. Groß D., Wilhelmy S. Klinische Obduktionen aus medizinethischer Sicht [Clinical autopsies from a medical ethics perspective] Pathologe. 2017;38:396–401. doi: 10.1007/s00292-017-0328-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiao J., Krueger G.R., Buja L.M., Covinsky M. The impact of declining clinical autopsy: Need for revised healthcare policy. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2009;337:41–46. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318184ce2b. - DOI - PubMed