Ultrathin Struts Drug-Eluting Stents: A State-of-the-Art Review
- PMID: 36143162
- PMCID: PMC9503315
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091378
Ultrathin Struts Drug-Eluting Stents: A State-of-the-Art Review
Abstract
New-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) represent the standard of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recent iterations in DES technology have led to the development of newer stent platforms with a further reduction in strut thickness. This new DES class, known as ultrathin struts DESs, has struts thinner than 70 µm. The evidence base for these devices consists of observational data, large-scale meta-analyses, and randomized trials with long-term follow-up, which have been conducted to investigate the difference between ultrathin struts DESs and conventional new-generation DESs in a variety of clinical settings and lesion subsets. Ultrathin struts DESs may further improve the efficacy and safety profile of PCI by reducing the risk of target-lesion and target-vessel failures in comparison to new-generation DESs. In this article, we reviewed device characteristics and clinical data of the Orsiro (Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland), Coroflex ISAR (B. Braun Melsungen, Germany), BioMime (Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Gujarat, India), MiStent (MiCell Technologies, USA), and Supraflex (Sahajanand Medical Technologies, Surat, India) sirolimus-eluting stents.
Keywords: coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stents; percutaneous coronary intervention; ultrathin struts.
Conflict of interest statement
Giovanni Esposito reports personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards Lifesciences, Terumo, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work and research grants to the institution from Alvimedica, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Raffaele Piccolo reports personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, Terumo, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Newer-Generation Ultrathin Strut Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Older Second-Generation Thicker Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery Disease.Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):2216-2226. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034456. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29945934
-
Comparison Among Ultra-Thin Coronary Stents: A Network Meta-Analysis.Am J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;216:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Am J Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38301755
-
Is There an Advantage of Ultrathin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents over Second- and Third-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents?J Pers Med. 2023 Apr 28;13(5):753. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050753. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37240923 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (BIOSTEMI): a single-blind, prospective, randomised superiority trial.Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1243-1253. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31877-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31488372 Clinical Trial.
-
Orsiro cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent: present and future perspectives.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Oct;14(10):773-788. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1378091. Epub 2017 Sep 19. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017. PMID: 28889769 Review.
Cited by
-
48-Month Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in an All-Comers Population with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Chronic Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent.J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 3;13(11):1573. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111573. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38003888 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical safety and performance of a biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in an all-comers population: results from the S-FLEX Russia registry.AsiaIntervention. 2025 Jul 30;11(2):e101-e109. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00045. eCollection 2025 Jul. AsiaIntervention. 2025. PMID: 40708988 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and performance of the ultrathin sirolimus-eluting coronary stent in an all-comer patient population: the S-FLEX UK-II registry.BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e084028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084028. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39438097 Free PMC article.
-
Mid-term safety and efficacy of magnesium bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - magmaris in diabetic population. 2-Years outcome in acute coronary syndrome cohort.Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2023 Jul-Aug;20(4):14791641231188705. doi: 10.1177/14791641231188705. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2023. PMID: 37439002 Free PMC article.
-
Bioinspired chitosan based functionalization of biomedical implant surfaces for enhanced hemocompatibility, antioxidation and anticoagulation potential: an in silico and in vitro study.RSC Adv. 2024 Jul 1;14(29):20691-20713. doi: 10.1039/d4ra00796d. eCollection 2024 Jun 27. RSC Adv. 2024. PMID: 38952927 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Piccolo R., Pilgrim T., Heg D., Franzone A., Rat-Wirtzler J., Räber L., Silber S., Serruys P.W., Jüni P., Windecker S. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of New-Generation Versus Early-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents According to Complexity of Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015;8:1657–1666. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.013. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tada T., Byrne R.A., Simunovic I., King L.A., Cassese S., Joner M., Fusaro M., Schneider S., Schulz S., Ibrahim T., et al. Risk of Stent Thrombosis Among Bare-Metal Stents, First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents, and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2013;6:1267–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.06.015. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous