Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 31;12(9):1422.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12091422.

IRO/Shift Test Is Comparable to the Jobe Test for Detection of Supraspinatus Lesions

Affiliations

IRO/Shift Test Is Comparable to the Jobe Test for Detection of Supraspinatus Lesions

George Fieseler et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

To determine how the internal rotation and shift (IRO/shift) test compares to the gold standard of clinical tests (Jobe test) for diagnosing supraspinatus lesions and to confirm these clinical results with surgical findings, 100 symptomatic patients were clinically examined between October 2018 and November 2019. All 100 patients were evaluated using both the IRO/shift test and Jobe test. A total of 48 of these patients received surgical intervention. Based on these data, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for both the IRO/shift test and Jobe test were calculated. The IRO/shift test had a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI: 82-100%), specificity of 50% (95% CI: 27-73%), PPV of 73% (95% CI: 56-86%), NPV of 91% (95% CI: 59-100%), and an accuracy of 77% (95% CI: 63-88%). The Jobe test had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 72-98%), specificity of 60% (95% CI: 36-81%), PPV of 76% (95% CI: 58-89%), NPV of 80% (95% CI: 52-96%), and an accuracy of 77% (95% CI: 54-81%). These results suggest that the IRO/shift test is comparable to the Jobe test, which is often viewed as the gold standard clinical examination for assessing supraspinatus lesions. This study was approved by the Ethics Commission of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (reference number: 2018-05).

Keywords: clinical; examination; rotator cuff; sensitivity; special test; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Passively applying elevation overpressure (shoulder adduction and internal rotation) to the patient’s end range of motion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdelwahab A., Ahuja N., Iyengar K.P., Jain V.K., Bakti N., Singh B. Traumatic rotator cuff tears—Current concepts in diagnosis and management. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma. 2021;18:51–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaid M.B., Young N.M., Pedoia V., Feeley B.T., Ma C.B., Lansdown D.A. Anatomic shoulder parameters and their relationship to the presence of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2019;28:2457–2466. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Minagawa H., Yamamoto N., Abe H., Fukuda M., Seki N., Kikuchi K., Kijima H., Itoi E. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village. J. Orthop. 2013;10:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Windt D.A., Koes B.W., Boeke A.J., Devillé W., De Jong B.A., Bouter L.M. Shoulder disorders in general practice: Prognostic indicators of outcome. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1996;46:519–523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Minns Lowe C.J., Moser J., Barker K. Living with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear ’bad days, bad nights’: A qualitative study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2014;15:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-228. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources