Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 14;12(9):1501.
doi: 10.3390/jpm12091501.

Impact of Early Limitation of Therapeutic Effort in Elderly COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit-A Cohort Study

Affiliations

Impact of Early Limitation of Therapeutic Effort in Elderly COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit-A Cohort Study

Thomas Lacoste-Palasset et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Admission to the ICU and intensity of care provided to elderly COVID-19 patients are difficult choices guided by the expected patient-centered benefits. However, the impact of an early discussion of limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) has been poorly investigated. (2) Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study including all ≥70-year-old COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. Factors associated with early LTE discussion (defined as before or up to 2 days post-ICU admission) and in-hospital mortality were evaluated. (3) Results: Eighty-two patients (59 M/23 F; 78 years (74−82) [median (interquartile range)]; 43/82 with LTE) were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 55%. Early LTE was decided upon for 22/82 patients (27%), more frequently in older (p < 0.001) and frailer patients (p = 0.004). Using a multivariable logistic regression model including clinical frailty scale grade ≥4, hospital acquisition of COVID-19, ventilation support modality and SOFA score on admission, early LTE was not associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 0.57 (0.15−2.00), p = 0.39). LTE resulted in less frequent invasive mechanical ventilation (23% versus 65%, p = 0.001), renal replacement therapy (5% versus 27%, p = 0.03) and norepinephrine infusion (23% versus 60%, p = 0.005), and shorter ICU stay (6 days (2−12) versus 14 days (7−24), p = 0.001). (4) Conclusions: In this small sample exploratory study, we were unable to demonstrate any increase in in-hospital mortality associated with early LTE discussion in elderly COVID-19 patients while reducing the use of organ support techniques. These findings require confirmation in larger studies.

Keywords: COVID-19; death; elderly; frailty; intensive care unit; limitation of therapeutic effort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. COVID-19, coronavirus infectious disease-2019; ICU, intensive care unit.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forrest plot representing the odds ratios of in-hospital mortality according to the clinical frailty scale grade, the hospital-acquired origin of COVID-19, the ventilation support modality initiated during the first 24 h and the early discussion of limitation of therapeutic effort. Comparisons were performed using a multivariable logistic regression model. Points represent the adjusted odds ratios and lines represent 95% confidence intervals. * Compared with high-flow nasal oxygen or conventional oxygen taken as reference. aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

References

    1. Guidet B., Vallet H., Boddaert J., de Lange D.W., Morandi A., Leblanc G., Artigas A., Flaatten H. Caring for the Critically Ill Patients over 80: A Narrative Review. Ann. Intensive Care. 2018;8:114. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0458-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Correia I., Simas Â., Chaves S., Paixão A.I., Catarino A., Gonçalves-Pereira J. The PALliative MUlticenter Study in Intensive Care (PalMuSIC). Results From a Multicenter Study Addressing Frailty and Palliative Care Interventions in Intensive Care Units in Portugal. J. Palliat. Care. 2022;37:552–561. doi: 10.1177/08258597211020964. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sprung C.L., Ricou B., Hartog C.S., Maia P., Mentzelopoulos S.D., Weiss M., Levin P.D., Galarza L., de la Guardia V., Schefold J.C., et al. Changes in End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units From 1999 to 2016. JAMA. 2019;322:1692–1704. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.14608. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avidan A., Sprung C.L., Schefold J.C., Ricou B., Hartog C.S., Nates J.L., Jaschinski U., Lobo S.M., Joynt G.M., Lesieur O., et al. Variations in End-of-Life Practices in Intensive Care Units Worldwide (Ethicus-2): A Prospective Observational Study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021;9:1101–1110. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azoulay É., Beloucif S., Guidet B., Pateron D., Vivien B., Le Dorze M. Admission Decisions to Intensive Care Units in the Context of the Major COVID-19 Outbreak: Local Guidance from the COVID-19 Paris-Region Area. Crit. Care Lond. Engl. 2020;24:293. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03021-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources