Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Aug 28;15(9):1071.
doi: 10.3390/ph15091071.

Concept of Hybrid Drugs and Recent Advancements in Anticancer Hybrids

Affiliations
Review

Concept of Hybrid Drugs and Recent Advancements in Anticancer Hybrids

Ankit Kumar Singh et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). .

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease, and its treatment is a big challenge, with variable efficacy of conventional anticancer drugs. A two-drug cocktail hybrid approach is a potential strategy in recent drug discovery that involves the combination of two drug pharmacophores into a single molecule. The hybrid molecule acts through distinct modes of action on several targets at a given time with more efficacy and less susceptibility to resistance. Thus, there is a huge scope for using hybrid compounds to tackle the present difficulties in cancer medicine. Recent work has applied this technique to uncover some interesting molecules with substantial anticancer properties. In this study, we report data on numerous promising hybrid anti-proliferative/anti-tumor agents developed over the previous 10 years (2011-2021). It includes quinazoline, indole, carbazole, pyrimidine, quinoline, quinone, imidazole, selenium, platinum, hydroxamic acid, ferrocene, curcumin, triazole, benzimidazole, isatin, pyrrolo benzodiazepine (PBD), chalcone, coumarin, nitrogen mustard, pyrazole, and pyridine-based anticancer hybrids produced via molecular hybridization techniques. Overall, this review offers a clear indication of the potential benefits of merging pharmacophoric subunits from multiple different known chemical prototypes to produce more potent and precise hybrid compounds. This provides valuable knowledge for researchers working on complex diseases such as cancer.

Keywords: anticancer agents; cell lines; in vitro; molecular hybridization; pharmacophore.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different methods of molecular hybridization. (A) Drug A and B are directly linked to each other; (B) brug A and B are merged with each other; (C) drug A and B are connected by a flexible spacer; (D) drug A and B are connected through a rigid spacer; (E) two pharmacophoric moieties are directly connected to each other; (F) two pharmacophoric moieties are connected by a flexible spacer; (G) two pharmacophoric moieties are connected by a rigid spacer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of quinazoline-based imidazole hybrids and the most promising compound 1a.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structure of quinazoline-based deoxynojirimycin hybrids and the most promising compound 2a.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structure of quinazoline-based urea hybrids and the most promising compound 3a.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Structure of quinazoline-based aryl hybrids and the most promising compound 4a.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Structure of aminoquinazoline-sulphonamide hybrids and the most promising compound 5a.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Structure of quinazoline-amino sulphonamide based hybrids and the most promising compound 6a.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Structure of quinazoline-artemisinin based hybrid 7.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Structure of quinazoline phenyl morpholine based hybrids and the most promising compound 8a.
Figure 10
Figure 10
FDA approved/clinical trial drugs with quinazoline hybrids.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Structure of indole with hydroxycinnamamide hybrid and the most promising compound 9a.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Structure of indole with hydroxycinnamamide hybrids and the most promising compound 10a.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Structure of indole with sulphonamide hybrids and the most promising compound 11a.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Structure of indole-triazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 12a.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Structure of indole-pyrimidine based hybrids and the most promising compound 13a.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Structure of indole-chalcone based hybrids and the most promising compound 14a.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Structure of indole-pyrole based hybrids and the most promising compound 15a.
Figure 18
Figure 18
Structure of indole-chalcone based hybrids and the most promising compound 16a.
Figure 19
Figure 19
Structure of indole-ospemifene-triazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 17a.
Figure 20
Figure 20
Structure of indole-ospemifene-triazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 18a.
Figure 21
Figure 21
FDA approved/clinical trial drugs with indole hybrids.
Figure 21
Figure 21
FDA approved/clinical trial drugs with indole hybrids.
Figure 22
Figure 22
Structure of carbazole-imidazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 19a.
Figure 23
Figure 23
A carbazole-piperazine hybrid (20).
Figure 24
Figure 24
Carbazole hybrids that are FDA approved/or under clinical trials.
Figure 25
Figure 25
A pyridine hybrid (21).
Figure 26
Figure 26
A pyrimidine-indazole based hybrid 22.
Figure 27
Figure 27
A pyrimidine-di-indazole based hybrid (23).
Figure 28
Figure 28
A pyrimidine hybrid (24).
Figure 29
Figure 29
Pyrimidine-pyrazole based hybrid (25 and 26).
Figure 30
Figure 30
A Pyrimidine-pyrazole based hybrid (27).
Figure 31
Figure 31
A pyrimidine-triazole based hybrid (28).
Figure 32
Figure 32
Structure of sulfonamide-thiazole fused pyrimidine hybrids and the most promising compound 29a.
Figure 33
Figure 33
Structure of tri-substituted pyrimidine hybrids and the most promising compound 30a.
Figure 34
Figure 34
Structure of a pyrimidine-triazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 31a.
Figure 35
Figure 35
Structure of pyrimidine-triazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 32a.
Figure 36
Figure 36
Structure of pyrimidine-pyrazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 33a.
Figure 37
Figure 37
Structure of pyrimidine-pyrazole based hybrids and the most promising compound 34a.
Figure 38
Figure 38
Pyrimidine based FDA approved drugs.
Figure 39
Figure 39
Structure of quinoline-guanidine based hybrid 35.
Figure 40
Figure 40
Structure of tetrahydro-pyrimido-quinoline based hybrid 36.
Figure 41
Figure 41
Structure of quinoline hybrid amsacrine 37 and the most promising compound 37a.
Figure 42
Figure 42
Structure of quinoline-indole based hybrids and the most promising compound 38a.
Figure 43
Figure 43
Structure of quinoline based ursolic acid hybrids and the most promising compound 39a.
Figure 44
Figure 44
Structure of quinolone-based piperazine hybrids and the most promising compound 40a.
Figure 45
Figure 45
Quinoline-based gallium(III) hybrid (41).
Figure 46
Figure 46
FDA approved drugs with quinoline hybrids.
Figure 47
Figure 47
Structure of quinone-based chalcone hybrids and the most promising compound 42a.
Figure 48
Figure 48
Structure of quinone based pyran hybrids and the most promising compound 43a.
Figure 49
Figure 49
FDA approved drugs with Quinone hybrids.
Figure 50
Figure 50
Structure of imidazole-based benzofuran hybrid derivatives (44).
Figure 51
Figure 51
Structure of imidazole based benzofuran hybrid derivatives (45).
Figure 52
Figure 52
Structure of imidazole based triazole hybrid derivatives (46).
Figure 53
Figure 53
Structure of imidazole-based artemisinin hybrid derivatives (47).
Figure 54
Figure 54
Structure of imidazole based benzofuran hybrid derivative 48.
Figure 55
Figure 55
Imidazole based anticancer drugs that are FDA approved or in clinical trials.
Figure 56
Figure 56
Organoselenium hybrid derivatives (49).
Figure 57
Figure 57
Structure of selenium-based quinone triazole hybrid derivatives (50).
Figure 58
Figure 58
Structure of selenium based anilino quinazoline hybrid derivatives (51).
Figure 59
Figure 59
Structure of selenium based anilino quinazoline hybrid derivatives (52).
Figure 60
Figure 60
Structure of selenium-based diaryl imidazole hybrid derivatives (53).
Figure 61
Figure 61
Selenium based potent anticancer compounds.
Figure 62
Figure 62
Structure of Platinum−acridine hybrid derivatives (54).
Figure 63
Figure 63
Platinum hybrid derivatives (5560).
Figure 64
Figure 64
Structure of Platinum (iv) dihydro-2-quinolone hybrid derivatives (61).
Figure 65
Figure 65
Structure of naproxen platinum (IV) hybrid derivatives.
Figure 66
Figure 66
Structure of Camptothecin-linked platinum hybrid derivatives (6769).
Figure 67
Figure 67
Structure of hydroxamic acid with artemisinin hybrid derivatives (70).
Figure 68
Figure 68
Structure of hydroxamate-β-carboline based hybrid derivatives (71).
Figure 69
Figure 69
Structure of hydroxamic acid based chalcone derivatives (72).
Figure 70
Figure 70
Structure of hydroxamic acid based 4-aminoquinazolin derivatives (73).
Figure 71
Figure 71
Structure of hydroxamic acid based indoline derivatives (74).
Figure 72
Figure 72
Structure of ferrocene-indole derivatives (75).
Figure 73
Figure 73
Structure of ferrocene containing a pyrazolyl derivative (76).
Figure 74
Figure 74
Structure of ferrocenyl-chalcone amide derivative (77).
Figure 75
Figure 75
Structure of ferrocene-coumarin moiety derivative (78).
Figure 76
Figure 76
Structure of ferrocene-chalcogeno (sugar) triazole conjugate derivatives (79).
Figure 77
Figure 77
Structure of curcumin-quinolone derivatives (80).
Figure 78
Figure 78
Structure of curcumin-sulfonamide derivatives (81).
Figure 79
Figure 79
Structure of curcumin-pyrazole derivative (82).
Figure 80
Figure 80
Structure of curcumin-pyrimidine derivatives (83).
Figure 81
Figure 81
Structure of curcumin-isatin derivatives (84).
Figure 82
Figure 82
Structure of triazole-pyrimidine derivatives (85).
Figure 83
Figure 83
Structure of triazole–myrrhanore C derivatives (86).
Figure 84
Figure 84
Structure of triazole-isoxazole derivatives (87).
Figure 85
Figure 85
Structure of triazole-dithiocarbamate derivatives (88).
Figure 86
Figure 86
Structure of triazole-thiazole derivative (89).
Figure 87
Figure 87
Structure of benzimidazole-pyrazole derivatives (90).
Figure 88
Figure 88
Structure of benzimidazole-pyrimidine derivatives (91).
Figure 89
Figure 89
Structure of benzimidazole–thiazolidinedione derivatives (92).
Figure 90
Figure 90
Structure of benzimidazole-quinazoline derivatives (93).
Figure 91
Figure 91
Structure of benzimidazole-β-Carboline derivatives (94).
Figure 92
Figure 92
Structure of isatin-based benzoazine derivatives (95).
Figure 93
Figure 93
Structure of isatin-dihydropyrazole derivatives (96).
Figure 94
Figure 94
Structure of isatin-pyridine derivatives [97(ac), 98, and 99 (ac)].
Figure 95
Figure 95
Structure of isatin-based coumarin derivatives (100).
Figure 96
Figure 96
Structure of isatin-indole derivatives (101).
Figure 97
Figure 97
Structure of isatin-benzoic acid derivatives (102).
Figure 98
Figure 98
Structure of isatin-thiazolo benzimidazole derivatives (103,104).
Figure 99
Figure 99
The isatin moiety as FDA-approved anticancer drug.
Figure 100
Figure 100
Structure of pyrrolo-benzodiazepine hybrids and the most promising compound 105a.
Figure 101
Figure 101
Structure of pyrrolo-benzodiazepine-based benzoindolone derivative (106).
Figure 102
Figure 102
Structure of pyrrolo-benzodiazepine-dione derivatives [107(ac),108(ac)].
Figure 103
Figure 103
Structure of triazole-pyrrolo-benzodiazepines derivative [109(ac),110(ac)].
Figure 104
Figure 104
Pyrrolo-benzodiazapine containing FDA approved anticancer drug.
Figure 105
Figure 105
Naturally occurring phytoconstituents containing chalcone.
Figure 106
Figure 106
Structure of chalcone-based phenothiazine hybrids and the most promising compound 111a.
Figure 107
Figure 107
Structure of chalcone-based benzoxadiazole hybrids and the most promising compound 112a.
Figure 108
Figure 108
Structure of chalcone-based triazolo-quinoxaline hybrids and the most promising compound 113a.
Figure 109
Figure 109
Structure of chalcone based melatonin hybrids and the most promising compound 114a.
Figure 110
Figure 110
Structure of chalcone-based quinoxalin hybrids and the most promising compound 115e.
Figure 111
Figure 111
Structure of coumarin-benzimidazole derivatives 116(ae).
Figure 112
Figure 112
Structure of coumarin containing 1,2,3-triazole derivatives 117(ae).
Figure 113
Figure 113
Structure of coumarin containing chalcone derivative [118(ac),119(ac)].
Figure 114
Figure 114
Structure of coumarin-based uracil derivatives 120(ae).
Figure 115
Figure 115
Structure of coumarin-based furoxin derivatives 121(ae).
Figure 116
Figure 116
Structure of nitrogen mustard contain oridonin derivatives 122(ad).
Figure 117
Figure 117
Structure of nitrogen mustard-containing thiazole derivatives 123(ae).
Figure 118
Figure 118
Structure of nitrogen mustard-containing triazine derivatives 124(ad).
Figure 119
Figure 119
Structure of androstane oxime-nitrogen mustard hybrids [125(a-b),126(a-b)].
Figure 120
Figure 120
Structure of pyrazole-based indole derivatives 127(ae).
Figure 121
Figure 121
Structure of benzofuran-pyrazole-based derivatives 128(ad).
Figure 122
Figure 122
Structure of quinazoline-pyrazole-based derivatives (129131) and pyrazole derivative (132133).
Figure 123
Figure 123
Structure of pyrazoline-pyrazole-based derivatives 134(ae).
Figure 124
Figure 124
Structure of pyrazole acrylic acid-based oxadiazole derivatives 135(ac).
Figure 125
Figure 125
Structure of biquinoline-pyridine hybrid derivative 136(ae).
Figure 126
Figure 126
Structure of isatin-pyridine derivative [137,138(ad)].
Figure 127
Figure 127
Structure of pyrazolo [3,4] pyridine derivatives [139(ad),140(ad)].

References

    1. Rana A., Alex J.M., Chauhan M., Joshi G., Kumar R. A review on pharmacophoric designs of antiproliferative agents. Med. Chem. Res. 2015;24:903–920. doi: 10.1007/s00044-014-1196-5. - DOI
    1. Kori S. An overview: Several causes of breast cancer. Epidemol. Int. J. 2018;2:000107. doi: 10.23880/EIJ-16000107. - DOI
    1. Hassanpour S.H., Dehghani M. Review of cancer from perspective of molecular. J. Cancer Res. Pract. 2017;4:127–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrpr.2017.07.001. - DOI
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Philip C.C., Mathew A., John M.J. Cancer care: Challenges in the developing world. Cancer Res. Treat. 2018;1:58–62.

LinkOut - more resources