The Role of Needle Fear in Pediatric Flu Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bologna Metropolitan Area
- PMID: 36146466
- PMCID: PMC9506010
- DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091388
The Role of Needle Fear in Pediatric Flu Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study in Bologna Metropolitan Area
Abstract
(1) Background: vaccination is the most effective way to prevent influenza and reduce its complications. The main aim of the study is to assess a possible increase of parents'/caregivers' pediatric flu vaccination adherence due to a nasal administration as an alternative to injection in Bologna. (2) Methods: 169 parents/guardians of children who were joining the COVID-19 pediatric vaccination session in Bologna were interviewed. The results were summarized using descriptive statistics. A multiple logistic regression model was used to assess the determinants of the change in flu vaccine uptake if offered without injection administration. All analyses were conducted using STATA and R-Studio software. (3) Results: Only 29.0% of parents were informed about pediatric flu vaccination by pediatricians, and 32.5% heard about pediatric flu vaccination. Almost 72.2% of parents declared that they would not have their children vaccinated against influenza. Thus, 40.2% of them changed their opinion after being informed about the existence of a non-injective vaccine. Needle fear in children turned out to be a determinant of this opinion change (OR = 3.79; 95% CI = 1.63-9.43; p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: the study has confirmed that needle fear is a determinant of vaccine hesitancy and that a different method of administration may increase parents'/guardians' adherence.
Keywords: SAGE group; children; flu vaccine; needle fear; survey; vaccine hesitancy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript, and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is an original work and is not under review in any other publication. The lead author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as originally planned in their published protocol have been explained.
References
-
- Arbeitskreis Blut, Untergruppe «Bewertung Blutassoziierter Krankheitserreger» Influenza Virus. Transfus. Med. Hemotherapy. 2009;36:32–39. doi: 10.1159/000197314. - DOI
-
- Flu (Influenza), National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, 29 Agosto 2019. [(accessed on 3 August 2022)]. Available online: https://www.nfid.org/infectious-diseases/influenza-flu/
-
- Boccalini S., Pariani E., Calabrò G.E., Waure C.D.E., Panatto D., Amicizia D., Lai P.L., Rizzo C., Amodio E., Vitale F., et al. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) dell’introduzione della vaccinazione antinfluenzale per la popolazione giovanile italiana con il vaccino Fluenz Tetra® [Health Technology Assessment (HTA) of the introduction of influenza vaccination for Italian children with Fluenz Tetra®] J. Prev. Med. Hyg. 2021;62((Suppl. S1)):E1–E118. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2s1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Flu & Young Children|CDC. [(accessed on 3 August 2022)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/highrisk/children.htm.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources