Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;50(1):460-486.
doi: 10.1214/21-aos2116. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

CANONICAL THRESHOLDING FOR NON-SPARSE HIGH-DIMENSIONAL LINEAR REGRESSION

Affiliations

CANONICAL THRESHOLDING FOR NON-SPARSE HIGH-DIMENSIONAL LINEAR REGRESSION

Igor Silin et al. Ann Stat. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

We consider a high-dimensional linear regression problem. Unlike many papers on the topic, we do not require sparsity of the regression coefficients; instead, our main structural assumption is a decay of eigenvalues of the covariance matrix of the data. We propose a new family of estimators, called the canonical thresholding estimators, which pick largest regression coefficients in the canonical form. The estimators admit an explicit form and can be linked to LASSO and Principal Component Regression (PCR). A theoretical analysis for both fixed design and random design settings is provided. Obtained bounds on the mean squared error and the prediction error of a specific estimator from the family allow to clearly state sufficient conditions on the decay of eigenvalues to ensure convergence. In addition, we promote the use of the relative errors, strongly linked with the out-of-sample R 2. The study of these relative errors leads to a new concept of joint effective dimension, which incorporates the covariance of the data and the regression coefficients simultaneously, and describes the complexity of a linear regression problem. Some minimax lower bounds are established to showcase the optimality of our procedure. Numerical simulations confirm good performance of the proposed estimators compared to the previously developed methods.

Keywords: 62H25; High-dimensional linear regression; Primary 62J05; covariance eigenvalues decay; principal component regression; relative errors; secondary 62H12; thresholding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1:
Fig 1:
Comparison of NCT, GCT, and PCR estimators on an artificial example with r = 12. On the horizontal axes – an index of the component j, on the vertical axes – the coefficient of the canonical least squares θ˜jLS. The red dotted lines depict the thresholding boundaries. The coefficients falling into the shaded area are thresholded/truncated to zero and depicted in gray. The coefficients surviving the thresholding/truncation are depicted in purple, orange, and teal, respectively.
Fig 2:
Fig 2:
Dependence of Dq,keff(Σ,β) on d.
Fig 3:
Fig 3:
Rates for the relative errors of the NCT estimator in polynomial decay scenario.

References

    1. BAIR E, HASTIE T, PAUL D and TIBSHIRANI R (2006). Prediction by supervised principal components. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 101, 473, 119–137.
    1. BARTLETT P, LONG P, LUGOSI G and TSIGLER A (2020). Benign overfitting in linear regression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. - PMC - PubMed
    1. BELKIN M (2018). Approximation beats concentration? An approximation view on inference with smooth radial kernels. Proc. Mach. Learn. Res., 75, 1–18.
    1. BELKIN M, HSU D and XU J (2019). Two models of double descent for weak features. ArXiv:1903.07571.
    1. BELLEC P, LECUÉ G and TSYBAKOV A (2018). SLOPE meets Lasso: improved oracle bounds and optimality. Ann. Statist., 46, 6B, 3603–3642.

LinkOut - more resources