Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 16;79(3):254-259.
doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v79.n3.36975.

[Prevalence of diarrhea in adult patients in intensive care and its relationship with ready-to-use enteral formulas]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations

[Prevalence of diarrhea in adult patients in intensive care and its relationship with ready-to-use enteral formulas]

[Article in Spanish]
Sebastián Chapela et al. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. .

Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhea is a frequent complication in critically ill patients. Its origin is multifactorial. The objective of this work is to analyze the relationship between 5 ready-to-use formulas and the development of diarrhea in critically ill patients.

Methods: Retrospective study where the volume of the stools of 315 patients and the presence of diarrhea defined with a cut-off point of a volume of 250 ml/day were evaluated. 35.34% of the patients presented diarrhea with said cut-off point. The mean volume of stools was 269.20 ml (95% CI: 255.05-283.06).

Results: It was observed that all the formulas analyzed had a slight correlation with the Spearman test between the volume provided and the volume of stools, being: Nutricia Nutrison ® (R: 0.159; P: 0.053), Nutricia Multifibra ® (R: 0.296; <0.001), Nutricia Peptisorb ® (R: 0.323; P<0.001), Nutricia Protison ® (R: 0.108; P<0.001), Fresenius Supportan ® (R: 0.152; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis was performed and it was observed that there were no differences in the incidence of diarrhea between the different enteral formulas during the first 10 days. The change of formulas during hospitalization would be a predisposing factor for diarrhea.

Conclusion: Therefore, the formula and the volume provided are factors that could influence whether patients have diarrhoea. Understanding these possible influences in a deeper way will allow the safest choice of enteral formulas for a patient with diarrhea.

Introducción: La diarrea es una complicación frecuente en los pacientes críticos. Su origen es multifactorial. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la relación entre 5 fórmulas listas para usar y el desarrollo de diarrea en pacientes críticos.

Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo donde se evaluó el volumen de las deposiciones de 315 pacientes y la presencia de diarrea definida con un punto de corte con un volumen de 250 ml/día.

Resultados: 35.34% de los pacientes presentaron diarrea con dicho punto de corte. El volumen medio de deposiciones fue de 269.20 ml (IC 95%: 255.05-283.06). Se observó que todas las fórmulas analizadas tenían una correlación leve con la prueba de spearman entre el volumen aportado y el volumen de las deposiciones, siendo: Nutricia Nutrison ® (R: 0.159; P: 0.053), Nutricia Multifibra ® (R: 0.296; <0.001), Nutricia Peptisorb ® (R: 0.323; P<0.001), Nutricia Protison ® (R: 0.108; P<0.001), Fresenius Supportan ® (R: 0.152; P<0.001). Se realizó análisis multivariado y se observó que no hubo diferencias en la incidencia de diarrea entre las distintas fórmulas enterales durante los primeros 10 días. La fibra soluble sería un factor protector en cambio la fibra mixta y semielemental serían factores que aumentan la incidencia de diarrea.

Conclusión: Por lo tanto, la fórmula y el volumen aportado son factores que podrían influenciar en que los pacientes tengan diarrea. Entendiendo estas posibles influencias de una manera mas profunda, permitirá elegir las formulas enterales con mas seguridad para un paciente con diarrea.

Keywords: diarrhea; nutrition, food and diet; critical care outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicto de interés:

Ninguno.

Figures

Figura Nº1
Figura Nº1. Correlación entre el volumen recibido de fórmulas enterales y volumen de deposiciones.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, McCarthy MS, Davanos E, Rice TW, Cresci GA, Gervasio JM, Sacks GS, Roberts PR, Compher C, Society of Critical Care Medicine. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Feb;40(2):159–211. doi: 10.1177/0148607115621863. Erratum in: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016 Nov;40(8):1200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer P, Blaser AR, Berger MM, Alhazzani W, Calder PC, Casaer MP, Hiesmayr M, Mayer K, Montejo JC, Pichard C, Preiser JC, van Zanten ARH, Oczkowski S, Szczeklik W, Bischoff SC. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit. Clin Nutr. 2019 Feb;38(1):48–79. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bischoff SC, Singer P, Koller M, Barazzoni R, Cederholm T, van Gossum A. Standard operating procedures for ESPEN guidelines and consensus papers. Clin Nutr. 2015 Dec;34(6):1043–51. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ichimaru S. Methods of Enteral Nutrition Administration in Critically Ill Patients: Continuous, Cyclic, Intermittent, and Bolus Feeding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;33(6):790–795. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10105. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reintam Blaser A, Deane AM, Fruhwald S. Diarrhoea in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Apr;21(2):142–53. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000188. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources