Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 23;24(9):e35643.
doi: 10.2196/35643.

Emergency Visits and Hospitalization After Chat Message, Voice Call, or Video Call for Telehealth in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Telehealth Service User Data in Japan: Cross-sectional Study

Koichi Sakakibara  1 , Daisuke Shigemi  2 , Rena Toriumi  2 , Ai Ota  2 , Nobuaki Michihata  3 , Hideo Yasunaga  4
Affiliations

Emergency Visits and Hospitalization After Chat Message, Voice Call, or Video Call for Telehealth in Obstetrics and Gynecology Using Telehealth Service User Data in Japan: Cross-sectional Study

Koichi Sakakibara et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: In obstetric and gynecologic practices, synchronous telehealth services via chat message, voice calls, and video calls have been increasingly equipped to improve patients' health care accessibility and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, differences in clinical outcomes between communication tools remain unknown, especially in terms of safety.

Objective: This study compared the occurrence of emergency visits and hospitalization after telehealth services through different communication tools, including chat messages, voice calls, and video calls.

Methods: We collected data on obstetric and gynecologic concerns of women who consulted specialized doctors and midwives through a telehealth consulting service in Japan (Sanfujin-ka Online) between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020. The outcomes were emergency visits or hospitalizations at night after the consultation. Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to compare the clinical outcomes between the groups who received telehealth services via chat message, voice calls, and video calls.

Results: This study included 3635 participants. The mean age of the participants was 31.4 (SD 5.7) years, and the largest age group (n=2154, 59.3%) was 30-39 years. The numbers (or proportions) of those who received telehealth services via chat message, voice calls, and video calls were 1584 (43.5%), 1947 (53.6%), and 104 (2.9%), respectively. The overall incidence of the outcome was 0.7% (26/3635), including 10 (0.3%) cases of chat message, 16 (0.5%) cases of voice calls, and no video calls. There were no emergency visits that happened due to inappropriate advice. No significant difference in the proportions of the outcomes was observed between the communication tools (P=.55). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in the outcome between those who used chat message and those who used voice calls (odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 0.73-3.65).

Conclusions: The communication tools of telehealth services in obstetrics and gynecology did not show a significant difference in terms of emergency visits or hospitalizations after using the service.

Keywords: chat message; eHealth; gynecology; mHealth; mobile health; obstetrics; safety; telehealth; telemedicine; video call; voice call.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: DS, RT, and AO were employed by Kids Public Inc, Japan. Other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brown HL, DeNicola N. Telehealth in maternity care. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;47(3):497–502. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.05.003.S0889-8545(20)30049-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Global Observatory for eHealth . Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states: report on the second global survey on eHealth. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. pp. 1–93.
    1. Demeke HB, Merali S, Marks S, Pao LZ, Romero L, Sandhu P, Clark H, Clara A, McDow KB, Tindall E, Campbell S, Bolton J, Le X, Skapik JL, Nwaise I, Rose MA, Strona FV, Nelson C, Siza C. Trends in use of telehealth among health centers during the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, June 26-November 6, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 19;70(7):240–244. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7007a3. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7007a3. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeNicola N, Grossman D, Marko K, Sonalkar S, Butler Tobah YS, Ganju N, Witkop CT, Henderson JT, Butler JL, Lowery C. Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;135(2):371–382. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003646. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31977782 00006250-202002000-00016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whittington JR, Ramseyer AM, Taylor CB. Telemedicine in low-risk obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2020 Jun;47(2):241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2020.02.006.S0889-8545(20)30020-6 - DOI - PubMed