Environmental and Climate Impact Perceptions in University Students: Sustainability Motivations and Perceptions Correspond With Lower Red Meat Intake
- PMID: 36150669
- PMCID: PMC10764093
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.09.015
Environmental and Climate Impact Perceptions in University Students: Sustainability Motivations and Perceptions Correspond With Lower Red Meat Intake
Abstract
Background: Red meat production is a leading contributor to food-related greenhouse gas emissions. Decreasing red meat intake can mitigate climate change and lower risk of diet-related diseases.
Objective: The goal of this study is to evaluate university students' perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and to assess how these perceptions are associated with the frequency of red meat intake.
Design: Cross-sectional survey SETTING: A large, public California university and a large, public Michigan university PARTICIPANTS: Undergraduate students from a California university (n = 721) and a Michigan university (n = 568) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and frequency of red meat intake STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Differences in perceptions by student characteristics were compared using t-tests and one-way analysis of variance. Associations between perceptions of climate-friendly behaviors and red meat intake frequency were examined using generalized linear models, adjusted for sociodemographic covariates.
Results: Across both universities, students rated reducing meat intake as less effective than other climate change mitigation behaviors such as recycling and using less plastic. However, students who reported (1) making food and beverage choices that "are good for the environment," (2) making food and beverage choices that "reduce climate change impact," or (3) agreeing that "eating less meat is an effective way to combat climate change" reported 10% to 25% lower frequency of red meat intake for each point higher on the agreement scale. In contrast, making food and beverage choices motivated by health was not associated with frequency of red meat intake.
Conclusions: Sustainability motivations and perceptions of meat's climate impact were associated with lower frequency of red meat intake, despite the overall moderate rating of eating less meat as an effective climate change mitigator. This research lends support to behavioral interventions, public education campaigns, and policies aiming to reinforce sustainable dietary patterns in young adults.
Keywords: Climate change; Environmental attitudes; Plant-based diets; Red meat; Young adults.
Copyright © 2023 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Environmental-, Climate-, and Health-Related Dietary Motivations Are Associated With Higher Diet Quality in a National Sample of US Adults With Lower Incomes.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024 May;124(5):594-606. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.11.021. Epub 2023 Dec 2. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2024. PMID: 38048878
-
Climate change menu labels in a university cafeteria: effects on student's diets, perceptions, and attitudes.Appetite. 2025 Jul 1;211:108001. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108001. Epub 2025 Apr 4. Appetite. 2025. PMID: 40188952
-
Dietary patterns of university students in the UK: a cross-sectional study.Nutr J. 2018 Oct 5;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0398-y. Nutr J. 2018. PMID: 30290816 Free PMC article.
-
Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability.Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2446-56. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000567. Epub 2015 Mar 13. Public Health Nutr. 2015. PMID: 25766000 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of meat in strategies to achieve a sustainable diet lower in greenhouse gas emissions: A review.Meat Sci. 2017 Oct;132:189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.014. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Meat Sci. 2017. PMID: 28460836 Review.
Cited by
-
Health-Promoting and Sustainable Behavior in University Students in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;20(7):5238. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075238. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37047853 Free PMC article.
-
Developing messages to encourage healthy, sustainable dietary substitutions: A qualitative study with US emerging adults.Appetite. 2024 Apr 1;195:107223. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107223. Epub 2024 Jan 20. Appetite. 2024. PMID: 38246428 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian farmers' perceptions of social sustainability in agriculture.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0299100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299100. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38669228 Free PMC article.
-
Current status of the novel food ingredient safety evaluation system.Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023 Aug 9;33(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10068-023-01396-w. eCollection 2024 Jan. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 38186627 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mitigation of the U.S. agrifood sector's contribution to human and planetary health: a case study.Front Nutr. 2023 Nov 16;10:1297214. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1297214. eCollection 2023. Front Nutr. 2023. PMID: 38035359 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Watts N, Amann M, Ayeb-Karlsson S, et al. The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health. The Lancet. 2018;391:581–630. - PubMed
-
- Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 2018;360:987–992. - PubMed
-
- Godfray HCJ, Aveyard P, Garnett T, et al. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018;361. - PubMed
-
- Hartmann C, Siegrist M. Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption: A systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2017;61:11–25.