Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36150940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.08.006
Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through November 2021 to identify studies comparing TAVR + PCI and SAVR + CABG for severe aortic stenosis with concurrent coronary artery disease. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, repeat coronary intervention, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke during follow-up, and 30-day periprocedural outcomes.
Results: Two randomized controlled trials and 6 observational studies including a total of 104,220 patients (TAVR + PCI, n = 5004; SAVR + CABG, n = 99,216) were included. The weighted mean follow-up period was 30.2 months. TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality and coronary reintervention during follow-up period (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.65; P = .003, hazard ratio, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.74-9.86; P = .001, respectively), 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.61-8.95; P = .002), and periprocedural vascular complications (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.85-26.30; P = .004). In contrast, TAVR + PCI was associated with a lower rate of 30-day acute kidney injury (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.50; P = .0001). Rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke during follow-up, and other periprocedural outcomes including 30-day mortality were similar in both groups.
Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality at follow-up compared with SAVR + CABG. Heart Team approach to assess TAVR candidacy remains imperative.
Keywords: aortic stenosis; coronary artery disease; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2022 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Commentary: Apples to oranges: Individualized approach in aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease requires careful comparison and granular data.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr;167(4):1314-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Sep 16. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 36243602 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Surgical vs Transcatheter Treatment in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Severe Aortic Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov 11;17(21):2472-2485. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.003. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024. PMID: 39537270
-
Coronary revascularization during treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A meta-analysis of the complete percutaneous approach (PCI plus TAVR) versus the complete surgical approach (CABG plus SAVR).J Card Surg. 2020 Aug;35(8):2009-2016. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14814. Epub 2020 Jul 15. J Card Surg. 2020. PMID: 32667080
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and percutaneous coronary intervention versus surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(5):1113-1125. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29110. Epub 2020 Jul 14. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32662594
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- management of patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing aortic valve interventions: surgical compared to catheter-based approaches in hybrid procedures.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 May 14;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1087-2. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019. PMID: 31088373 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous versus surgical approach to aortic valve replacement with coronary revascularization: A systematic review andmeta-analysis.Perfusion. 2024 Sep;39(6):1152-1160. doi: 10.1177/02676591231178894. Epub 2023 May 24. Perfusion. 2024. PMID: 37224394
Cited by
-
Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Dec 18;17(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-02061-9. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022. PMID: 36529781 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Coronary Artery Disease and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 11;4(4):102574. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102574. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025. PMID: 40308232 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- to intermediate-risk patients: a meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(2):73-84. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0096. Epub 2024 Dec 6. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40270848 Free PMC article.
-
A case of hybrid robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting and valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J Cardiol Cases. 2024 Mar 22;30(1):12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2024.03.001. eCollection 2024 Jul. J Cardiol Cases. 2024. PMID: 39007046 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of TAVI performance overtime: an overview of systematic reviews.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03980-2. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024. PMID: 38907344 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous