Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;33(3):1593-1602.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09139-x. Epub 2022 Sep 24.

Contrast-enhanced lymphatic US can improve the preoperative diagnostic performance for sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer

Affiliations

Contrast-enhanced lymphatic US can improve the preoperative diagnostic performance for sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer

Zihan Niu et al. Eur Radiol. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the preoperative diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced lymphatic ultrasound (CEUS) for the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early breast cancer.

Materials and methods: We prospectively recruited 102 consecutive patients with clinically node-negative early breast cancer from July 2021 to October 2021. All patients underwent conventional US and percutaneous CEUS examinations. The CEUS of SLNs were classified into four enhancement patterns: homogeneous (I), featured inhomogeneous (II), focal defect (III), and no enhancement (IV). The diagnostic performance of conventional US and CEUS for SLN metastasis was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curves.

Results: A total of 78 women were enrolled in this study, including 55, 18, and 5 patients with negative axilla, 1-2, and ≥ 3 metastastic SLNs pathologically, respectively. The identification rate of SLNs by CEUS was 100%. Patterns I and II can select 91.7% (44/48) of patients with disease-free axilla, while patterns III and IV had higher percentages of metastasis (65.2%, p < 0.001 and 57.1%, p < 0.002, respectively). For the SLN metastatic burden, 100% (48/48) of patients with pattern I/II had ≤ 2 metastatic SLNs. Compared with conventional US, the CEUS enhancement patterns showed significant improvement in diagnosing metastatic SLNs (0.813 vs 0.601, p < 0.001). CEUS had greater clinical benefits and correctly reclassified 48% of metastatic SLNs (p < 0.001) without sacrificing the classification accuracy of negative SLNs (p = 0.25), and could improve prediction accuracy by 0.42 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: CEUS demonstrated better diagnostic performance and greater clinical benefits than conventional US for the preoperative diagnosis of SLNs, showing its potential to select candidates for precluding axillary surgery in early breast cancer.

Key points: • The homogeneous and featured inhomogeneous enhancement of SLNs are highly suggestive of negative LNs, while focal defect (p < 0.001) and no enhancement (p < 0.002) patterns had higher percentages of metastasis. • The proportion of SLNs with highly suspicious signs on conventional US increases as the type of enhancement pattern increases (no suspicious signs in pattern I/II, 34.8% in pattern III, and 85.7% in pattern IV). • Compared with conventional US, CEUS improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.813 vs. 0.601, p < 0.001) and had greater clinical benefits (IDI = 0.42, p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of axillary metastasis.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Contrast media; Sentinel lymph node; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of this study. CEUS, contrast-enhanced US; US, ultrasound; SLN, sentinel lymph node
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The four types of CEUS enhancement patterns of SLNs. With the live-dual mode, the enhancement pattern (left) and the greyscale (right) images are shown in figures. A Pattern I, homogeneous enhancement. The entire lymph node showed bright, homogeneous enhancement. B Pattern II, cribriform enhancement. The SLN had a low enhancement with an even distribution inside the node resembling a sieve mesh. C Pattern II, half-moon enhancement, a semilunar, homogeneous enhancement with a centred afferent lymph vessel or enhancement of the cortex with a contrast agent. D Pattern II, ring enhancement, a regular, uniform, bright ring enhancement at the periphery of the node. E Pattern III, focal defect enhancement. The uneven distribution of the contrast agent with filling defect areas (*) of the SLN is seen correlating to the focal eccentric cortical thickening (arrow) on grayscale US. F Pattern IV, no enhancement. The SLN showed no enhancement in the whole region (*) and focal eccentric cortical thickening (arrow) on grayscale US. US, ultrasound; CEUS, contrast-enhanced lymphatic US; SLN, sentinel lymph node
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The CEUS and conventional US for diagnosis of metastatic SLNs. a The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of conventional US (blue line) and CEUS enhancement pattern (red line). b Decision curves of conventional US (blue line) and CEUS enhancement pattern (red line) for metastatic SLNs. US, ultrasound; CEUS, contrast-enhanced lymphatic US; SLN, sentinel lymph node; ROC, the receiver operating characteristic

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011;305(6):569–575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(10):918–926. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11470. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voogd AC, Coebergh JW, Repelaer van Driel OJ, et al. The risk of nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with clinically negative lymph nodes: a population-based analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62(1):63–69. doi: 10.1023/A:1006447825160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giuliano AE, Haigh PI, Brennan MB, et al. Prospective observational study of sentinel lymphadenectomy without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(13):2553–2559. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2553. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927–933. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70207-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed