Nasal reconstructive techniques following Mohs surgery or excisions: a systematic review
- PMID: 36152047
- DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02390-8
Nasal reconstructive techniques following Mohs surgery or excisions: a systematic review
Abstract
Numerous reconstructive techniques for nasal defects following skin cancer removal have been described; however, the literature lacks a comprehensive systematic review. Our objective was to systematically review nasal reconstruction methods after tumor removal, correlate the use of specific techniques to the nasal subunits involved, assess the quality of the available evidence, and set the stage for future research on this topic. Eight databases were searched for studies published in English from January 2004 to December 2018 containing repair data for nasal defects following Mohs or excision for four or more subjects. Recorded data included author specialties, study design, subject number, demographics, defect characteristics, procedure type, reconstructive methods, outcome measures, and complications. One-hundred and eleven studies were included. Study types included case series (73%), observational cohort studies (25%), and clinical trials (2%). Most authors were dermatologic surgeons (61%). Resection was most commonly performed via Mohs (82%). Flaps (42%), linear closures (28%) and grafts (25%) were most utilized for reconstruction. In Zones I and II, transposition flaps were the most common followed by advancement flaps. In Zone III, full thickness skin grafts were the most common repair. Most studies were case series or small cohort studies, representing low level evidence. Flaps are the most common method described in the literature for nasal reconstruction. The overall quality of the evidence available on this topic is low.
Keywords: Flaps; Grafts; Mohs micrographic surgery; Nose; Reconstruction.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Periorbital reconstructive techniques following Mohs micrographic surgery or excisions: a systematic review.Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Sep;315(7):1853-1861. doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02523-z. Epub 2023 Jan 17. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023. PMID: 36646921
-
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10;(11):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub3. PMID: 15495033 Updated.
-
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5:CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2. PMID: 35037252 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Simplifying nasal reconstruction after Mohs surgery: an algorithm based on review of over 400 cases.Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025 Jun 25;50(7):1395-1398. doi: 10.1093/ced/llaf054. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2025. PMID: 39891544
-
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29667726 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Reconstruction of Small Nasal Defects.Semin Plast Surg. 2024 Dec 17;38(4):290-296. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1795098. eCollection 2024 Nov. Semin Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 39697405 Review.
References
References:
-
- EndNote [computer program]. Version X.7. Philadelphia, PA: Clarviate.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical