Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;315(3):333-337.
doi: 10.1007/s00403-022-02390-8. Epub 2022 Sep 24.

Nasal reconstructive techniques following Mohs surgery or excisions: a systematic review

Affiliations

Nasal reconstructive techniques following Mohs surgery or excisions: a systematic review

Michael J Visconti et al. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Numerous reconstructive techniques for nasal defects following skin cancer removal have been described; however, the literature lacks a comprehensive systematic review. Our objective was to systematically review nasal reconstruction methods after tumor removal, correlate the use of specific techniques to the nasal subunits involved, assess the quality of the available evidence, and set the stage for future research on this topic. Eight databases were searched for studies published in English from January 2004 to December 2018 containing repair data for nasal defects following Mohs or excision for four or more subjects. Recorded data included author specialties, study design, subject number, demographics, defect characteristics, procedure type, reconstructive methods, outcome measures, and complications. One-hundred and eleven studies were included. Study types included case series (73%), observational cohort studies (25%), and clinical trials (2%). Most authors were dermatologic surgeons (61%). Resection was most commonly performed via Mohs (82%). Flaps (42%), linear closures (28%) and grafts (25%) were most utilized for reconstruction. In Zones I and II, transposition flaps were the most common followed by advancement flaps. In Zone III, full thickness skin grafts were the most common repair. Most studies were case series or small cohort studies, representing low level evidence. Flaps are the most common method described in the literature for nasal reconstruction. The overall quality of the evidence available on this topic is low.

Keywords: Flaps; Grafts; Mohs micrographic surgery; Nose; Reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Reconstruction of Small Nasal Defects.
    Hollier P, Parham M, Layon SA, Thornton JF. Hollier P, et al. Semin Plast Surg. 2024 Dec 17;38(4):290-296. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1795098. eCollection 2024 Nov. Semin Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 39697405 Review.

References

References:

    1. Austin GK, Shockley WW (2016) Reconstruction of nasal defects: contemporary approaches. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 24:453–460 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Burget GC, Menick FJ (1985) The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 76:239–247 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Costin A, António AM, Goulão J (2019) Perialar semilunar advancement flap for the reconstruction of nasal sidewall defects: our experience. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 12:71–73 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Egeler SA, Johnson AR, Ibrahim AMS, Bucknor A et al (2019) Reconstruction of Mohs defects located in the head and neck. J Craniofac Surg 30:412–417 - DOI - PubMed
    1. EndNote [computer program]. Version X.7. Philadelphia, PA: Clarviate.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources