Variability of the VA interval at tachycardia induction: a simple method to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
- PMID: 36152135
- DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01376-w
Variability of the VA interval at tachycardia induction: a simple method to differentiate orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Abstract
Background: The differential diagnosis between orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (aAVNRT) is sometimes challenging. We hypothesize that aAVNRTs have more variability in the retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset than AVRTs.
Methods: We aimed to assess the variability in retrograde conduction time at tachycardia onset in AVRT and aAVNRT and to propose a new diagnostic tool to differentiate these two arrhythmia mechanisms. We measured the VA interval of the first beats after tachycardia induction until it stabilized. The difference between the maximum and minimum VA intervals (∆VA) and the number of beats needed for the VA interval to stabilize was analyzed. Atrial tachycardias were excluded.
Results: A total of 107 patients with aAVNRT (n = 37) or AVRT (n = 64) were included. Six additional patients with decremental accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia (DAPT) were analyzed separately. All aAVNRTs had VA interval variability. The median ∆VA was 0 (0 - 5) ms in AVRTs vs 40 (21 - 55) ms in aAVNRTs (p < 0.001). The VA interval stabilized significantly earlier in AVRTs (median 1.5 [1 - 3] beats) than in aAVNRTs (5 [4 - 7] beats; p < 0.001). A ∆VA < 10 ms accurately differentiated AVRT from aAVNRT with 100% of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The stabilization of the VA interval at < 3 beats of the tachycardia onset identified AVRT with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 64.1%, 94.6%, 95.3%, and 60.3%, respectively. A ∆VA < 20 ms yielded good diagnostic accuracy for DAPT.
Conclusions: A ∆VA < 10 ms is a simple and useful criterion that accurately distinguished AVRT from atypical AVNRT. Central panel: Scatter plot showing individual values of ∆VA in atypical AVNRT and AVRT. Left panel: induction of atypical AVNRT. The VA interval stabilizes at the 5th beat and the ∆VA is 62 ms (maximum VA interval: 172 ms - minimum VA interval: 110 ms). Right panel: induction of AVRT. The tachycardia has a fixed VA interval from the first beat. ∆VA is 0 ms.
Keywords: Atypical AV nodal reentry tachycardia; Decremental accessory pathway; Orthodromic AV reentry tachycardia; Supraventricular tachycardia; VA interval.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
His overdrive pacing during supraventricular tachycardia: a novel maneuver for distinguishing atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia.Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug;11(8):1327-35. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.038. Epub 2014 May 2. Heart Rhythm. 2014. PMID: 24793458
-
Local VA index for the differential diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia.Heart Rhythm. 2024 Jun;21(6):828-835. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.042. Epub 2024 Jan 27. Heart Rhythm. 2024. PMID: 38286245
-
"V-H-A Pattern" as a criterion for the differential diagnosis of atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia from AV reciprocating tachycardia.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jul;28(7):667-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00151.x. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005. PMID: 16008802
-
Accessory pathway reciprocating tachycardia.Eur Heart J. 1998 May;19 Suppl E:E13-24, E50-1. Eur Heart J. 1998. PMID: 9717020 Review.
-
Cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9842-2. Epub 2013 Nov 29. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24293174
Cited by
-
Spontaneous Variation of Ventriculo-Atrial Interval after Tachycardia Induction: Determinants and Usefulness in the Diagnosis of Supraventricular Tachycardias with Long Ventriculoatrial Interval.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 4;12(2):409. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020409. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36675339 Free PMC article.
-
Extra-cardiac vagal stimulation: Clinical utility of a novel diagnostic and therapeutic tool in supraventricular tachycardia.J Arrhythm. 2025 Jul 15;41(4):e70134. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70134. eCollection 2025 Aug. J Arrhythm. 2025. PMID: 40666710 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kadish AH, Morady F. The response of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia to overdrive atrial and ventricular pacing: can it help determine the tachycardia mechanism? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:239–52. - PubMed
-
- Ormaetxe JM, Almendral J, Arenal A, et al. Ventricular fusion during resetting and entrainment of orthodromic supraventricular tachycardia involving septal accessory pathways. Implications for the differential diagnosis with atrioventricular nodal reentry. Circulation. 1993;88:2623–31. - PubMed
-
- Martínez-Alday JD, Almendral J, Arenal A, et al. Identification of concealed posteroseptal Kent pathways by comparison of ventriculoatrial intervals from apical and posterobasal right ventricular sites. Circulation. 1994;89:1060–7. - PubMed
-
- Hirao K, Otomo K, Wang X, et al. Para-Hisian pacing. A new method for differentiating retrograde conduction over an accessory AV pathway from conduction over the AV node. Circulation. 1996;94:1027–35. - PubMed
-
- Knight BP, Ebinger M, Oral H, et al. Diagnostic value of tachycardia features and pacing maneuvers during paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:574–82. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources