Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;33(9):e13852.
doi: 10.1111/pai.13852.

Macadamia nut-specific IgE levels for predicting anaphylaxis

Affiliations

Macadamia nut-specific IgE levels for predicting anaphylaxis

Kei Kubota et al. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Despite the high risk of anaphylaxis in patients with a macadamia nut allergy (MdA), little is known about the significance of macadamia nut-specific immunoglobulin E (Md-sIgE). Thus, this study aimed to investigate the utility of Md-sIgE for predicting anaphylaxis.

Methods: Children with suspected MdA who visited our hospital were included. MdA was defined as either failing the 3-g macadamia nut (Md) oral food challenge (OFC) or confirming obvious immediate symptoms following Md ingestion. Non-MdA was defined as passing the 3-g Md OFC.

Results: A total of 41 children (29 [71%] males) with a median age of 7.7 years were included. The median Md-sIgE level was 2.23 kUA /L. Among the 21 children diagnosed with MdA, eight and 13 children did (An group) and did not (non-An group) develop anaphylaxis. Twenty children were included in the non-MdA group. The Md-sIgE level was significantly higher in the An group relative to the others (7.97 vs. 1.92 kUA /L, p < .001). Furthermore, the Md-sIgE level was significantly higher in the An group than in the non-An group (7.97 vs. 1.92 kUA /L, p = .02). However, there was no significant difference in the Md-sIgE between the non-An and non-MdA groups (1.92 vs. 1.90 kUA /L, p > .99). The area under the curve for predicting anaphylaxis in Md-sIgE was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00), and the optimal cut-off value was 3.76 kUA /L.

Conclusion: Md-sIgE levels were useful in predicting anaphylaxis. Above the cut-off value, we emphasize paying careful attention to the risk of anaphylaxis.

Keywords: allergy; anaphylaxis; cut-off; diagnosis; macadamia nut; probability curve; specific IgE.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Stiefel G, Anagnostou K, Boyle ARJ, et al. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of peanut and tree nut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2017;47:719-739.
    1. Brettig T, Dang T, McWilliam V, et al. The accuracy of diagnostic testing in determining tree nut allergy: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;9:2028-2049.
    1. McWilliam VL, Perrett KP, Dang T, et al. Prevalence and natural history of tree nut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;124:466-472.
    1. Brough HA, Caubet JC, Mazon A, et al. Defining challenge-proven coexistent nut and sesame seed allergy: a prospective multicenter European study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145:1231-1239.
    1. McWilliam VC, Koplin J, Lodge C, Tang M, Dharmage S, Allen K. The prevalence of tree nut allergy: a systematic review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15:54.

LinkOut - more resources