Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 7;28(33):4823-4833.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i33.4823.

Effectiveness, safety, and drug sustainability of biologics in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective study

Affiliations

Effectiveness, safety, and drug sustainability of biologics in elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective study

Gustavo Drügg Hahn et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Biologic therapy resulted in a significant positive impact on the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) however data on the efficacy and side effects of these therapies in the elderly is scant.

Aim: To evaluate retrospectively the drug sustainability, effectiveness, and safety of the biologic therapies in the elderly IBD population.

Methods: Consecutive elderly (≥ 60 years old) IBD patients, treated with biologics [infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADAL), vedolizumab (VDZ), ustekinumab (UST)] followed at the McGill University Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center were included between January 2000 and 2020. Efficacy was measured by clinical scores at 3, 6-9 and 12-18 mo after initiation of the biologic therapy. Patients completing induction therapy were included. Adverse events (AEs) or serious AE were collected during and within three months of stopping of the biologic therapy.

Results: We identified a total of 147 elderly patients with IBD treated with biologicals during the study period, including 109 with Crohn's disease and 38 with ulcerative colitis. Patients received the following biologicals: IFX (28.5%), ADAL (38.7%), VDZ (15.6%), UST (17%). The mean duration of biologic treatment was 157.5 (SD = 148) wk. Parallel steroid therapy was given in 34% at baseline, 19% at 3 mo, 16.3% at 6-9 mo and 6.5% at 12-18 mo. The remission rates at 3, 6-9 and 12-18 mo were not significantly different among biological therapies. Kaplan-Meyer analysis did not show statistical difference for drug sustainability (P = 0.195), time to adverse event (P = 0.158) or infection rates (P = 0.973) between the four biologics studied. The most common AEs that led to drug discontinuation were loss of response, infusion/injection reaction and infection.

Conclusion: Current biologics were not different regarding drug sustainability, effectiveness, and safety in the elderly IBD population. Therefore, we are not able to suggest a preferred sequencing order among biologicals.

Keywords: Adverse events; Biologics; Efficacy; Elderly; Inflammatory bowel disease; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Hahn GD, Qatomah A, Wang A, Boodaghians L, Liu Chen Kiow J, Al Ali M, and Wild G declared no conflict of interest; LeBlanc JF has been a speaker or advisory board member for Janssen and Takeda; Golovics PA has been a speaker for AbbVie, Takeda, Fresenius, Ferring; Wetwittayakhlang P has been a speaker and/or advisory board member: Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen, Ferring, A. Menerini, and MSD; Afif W has been a speaker for Janssen, Prometheus, Dynacare, Takeda, AbbVie Theradiag; Bitton A has been a member of Advisory Boards - Abbvie, Pfizer, Takeda, Janssen, Merck; Speaker’s bureau - Abbvie, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer; Lakatos PL has been a speaker and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Arena, Falk Pharma GmbH, Ferring, Genetech, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Shire, Takeda and Tillots, and has received unrestricted research grants from AbbVie, MSD and Pfizer; Bessissow T has been a speaker or advisory board member for Takeda, Janssen, Abbvie, Merck, Pfizer, Pendopharm, Ferring, Shire, Sandoz, BMS, Roche, Fresenius Kabi, Viatris.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time based on biologic therapy. A: Treatment discontinuation; B: Adverse event; C: Infection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinical response and remission rates in elderly inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with different biologicals according to Harvey-Bradshaw Index or Mayo scores. A: At 3 mo; B: At 6-9 mo; C: After 12-18 mo. CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: Ulcerative colitis; IBD: Inflammatory bowel disease.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jeuring SF, van den Heuvel TR, Zeegers MP, Hameeteman WH, Romberg-Camps MJ, Oostenbrug LE, Masclee AA, Jonkers DM, Pierik MJ. Epidemiology and Long-term Outcome of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnosed at Elderly Age-An Increasing Distinct Entity? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1425–1434. - PubMed
    1. Rozich JJ, Luo J, Dulai PS, Collins AE, Pham L, Boland BS, Sandborn WJ, Singh S. Disease- and Treatment-related Complications in Older Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Comparison of Adult-onset vs Elderly-onset Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2021;27:1215–1223. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ananthakrishnan AN, Donaldson T, Lasch K, Yajnik V. Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Elderly Patient: Challenges and Opportunities. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23:882–893. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Systematic review with meta-analysis: inflammatory bowel disease in the elderly. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:459–477. - PubMed
    1. Hruz P, Juillerat P, Kullak-Ublick GA, Schoepfer AM, Mantzaris GJ, Rogler G on behalf of Swiss IBDnet, an official working group of the Swiss Society of Gastroenterology. Management of the Elderly Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient. Digestion. 2020;101 Suppl 1:105–119. - PubMed

MeSH terms