Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 14:2022:6561622.
doi: 10.1155/2022/6561622. eCollection 2022.

A Natural Language Processing (NLP) Evaluation on COVID-19 Rumour Dataset Using Deep Learning Techniques

Affiliations

A Natural Language Processing (NLP) Evaluation on COVID-19 Rumour Dataset Using Deep Learning Techniques

Rubia Fatima et al. Comput Intell Neurosci. .

Abstract

Context and Background: Since December 2019, the coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemic has sparked considerable alarm among the general community and significantly affected societal attitudes and perceptions. Apart from the disease itself, many people suffer from anxiety and depression due to the disease and the present threat of an outbreak. Due to the fast propagation of the virus and misleading/fake information, the issues of public discourse alter, resulting in significant confusion in certain places. Rumours are unproven facts or stories that propagate and promote sentiments of prejudice, hatred, and fear. Objective. The study's objective is to propose a novel solution to detect fake news using state-of-the-art machines and deep learning models. Furthermore, to analyse which models outperformed in detecting the fake news. Method. In the research study, we adapted a COVID-19 rumours dataset, which incorporates rumours from news websites and tweets, together with information about the rumours. It is important to analyse data utilizing Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Deep Learning (DL) approaches. Based on the accuracy, precision, recall, and the f1 score, we can assess the effectiveness of the ML and DL algorithms. Results. The data adopted from the source (mentioned in the paper) have collected 9200 comments from Google and 34,779 Twitter postings filtered for phrases connected with COVID-19-related fake news. Experiment 1. The dataset was assessed using the following three criteria: veracity, stance, and sentiment. In these terms, we have different labels, and we have applied the DL algorithms separately to each term. We have used different models in the experiment such as (i) LSTM and (ii) Temporal Convolution Networks (TCN). The TCN model has more performance on each measurement parameter in the evaluated results. So, we have used the TCN model for the practical implication for better findings. Experiment 2. In the second experiment, we have used different state-of-the-art deep learning models and algorithms such as (i) Simple RNN; (ii) LSTM + Word Embedding; (iii) Bidirectional + Word Embedding; (iv) LSTM + CNN-1D; and (v) BERT. Furthermore, we have evaluated the performance of these models on all three datasets, e.g., veracity, stance, and sentiment. Based on our second experimental evaluation, the BERT has a superior performance over the other models compared.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of data structure adopted from [24].
Figure 2
Figure 2
COVID-19 rumour identification using AI techniques.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flowchart depicting the collecting, labelling, and postprocessing of datasets.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Labels in the dataset are highlighted—adopted from [24].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Schematic of the long short-term memory cell—adopted from [47].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Schematic of the Temporal Convolutional Networks—adopted from [50].
Figure 7
Figure 7
LSTM—the graphical representation of evaluating results for sentiment dataset.
Figure 8
Figure 8
TCN—the graphical representation of evaluating results for sentiment dataset.
Figure 9
Figure 9
LSTM—the graphical representation of evaluating results for veracity dataset.
Figure 10
Figure 10
TCN—the graphical representation of evaluating results for veracity dataset.
Figure 11
Figure 11
LSTM—the graphical representation of evaluating results for stance dataset.
Figure 12
Figure 12
TCN—the graphical representation of evaluating results for stance dataset.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Summary of simple RNN model.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Summary of LSTM + Word Embedding model.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Summary of Bidirectional + Word Embedding model.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Summary of LSTM + CNN-1D model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roosa K., Lee Y., Luo R., et al. Real-time forecasts of the COVID-19 epidemic in China from february 5th to february 24th, 2020. Infectious Disease Modelling . 2020;5:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2020.02.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan L., Zhang H. T., Xiao Y., et al. Prediction of Criticality in Patients with Severe Covid-19 Infection Using Three Clinical Features: A Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Model with Clinical Data in Wuhan . New Haven, CT, USA: medRxiv; 2020.
    1. Bernard Stoecklin S., Rolland P., Silue Y., et al. First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in France: surveillance, investigations and control measures, January 2020. Euro Surveillance . 2020;25(6) doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2020.25.6.2000094.2000094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet . 2020;395(10223):497–506. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahase E. Coronavirus: Covid-19 Has Killed More People than SARS and MERS Combined. despite lower case fatality rate . 2020;368 - PubMed