Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 8:9:975673.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.975673. eCollection 2022.

PK/PD integration of florfenicol alone and in combination with doxycycline against Riemerella anatipestifer

Affiliations

PK/PD integration of florfenicol alone and in combination with doxycycline against Riemerella anatipestifer

Huilin Zhang et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) is an important pathogen found in poultry. RA infection can kill ducks and lead to significant economic losses. Seven RA strains with different susceptibility phenotypes were chosen to study the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) integration of florfenicol (FF) alone and in combination with doxycycline (DOX). The checkerboard assay indicated that synergy [fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) ≤ 0.5] was detected in the CVCC3952 strain of RA and that additivity (FICI >0.5 to ≤ 1) was observed in other strains. Static time-kill curves showed that the bactericidal effect of FF against RA was produced at a FF concentration ≥4 MIC, and the antibacterial activity of FF against RA was enhanced from the aspects of efficacy and efficacy in combination with DOX. Dynamic time-kill curves indicated that FF elicited bactericidal activity against the CVCC3857 strain with a reduction ≥4.88 log10CFU/ml when the dose was ≥8 mg/L. However, a bactericidal effect was not achieved at the maximum administered dose of FF monotherapy (20 mg/L) for isolates with a MIC ≥4 μg/ml. The effect of FF against RA was enhanced upon combination with DOX. The combination of FF with DOX reduced the bacterial burden ≥4.53 log10CFU/ml for all strains with a MIC ≥4 μg/ml. Data were fitted to a sigmoidal Emax model. The PK/PD parameters of AUC24h/MIC (the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h divided by the MIC) and %T >MIC (the cumulative percentage of time over a 24-h period at which the concentration exceeded the MIC) of FF for eliciting a reduction of 3 log10CFU/ml was 40.10 h and 58.71, respectively. For strains with a MIC ≤ 16 μg/ml, the magnitude of the AUC24h/MIC and Cmax/MIC required for a 3 log10CFU/ml of bacterial killing was 34.84 h and 4.74 in the presence of DOX at 0.5 MIC, respectively. These data suggest that combination of FF with DOX enhanced the activity against RA strains with various susceptibilities to FF and DOX.

Keywords: PK/PD model; Riemerella anatipestifer; combination therapy; doxycycline; florfenicol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time–kill studies of florfenicol alone and in combination with doxycycline against Riemerella anatipestifer at constant concentrations [FF alone: (A), CVCC3952; (B), CVCC3857; FF in combination with DOX: (C), CVCC3952; (D), CVCC3857].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationship between the kill rate and concentration obtained from the Emax model at 0–9 h [FF alone: (A), CVCC3952; (B), CVCC3857; FF in combination with DOX: (C), CVCC3952; (D), CVCC3857).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Concentration–time curves of florfenicol in the dynamic model.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Dynamic time–kill curves of florfenicol alone against R. anatipestifer.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Emax relationships for the three PK/PD parameters of florfenicol used alone vs. the antibacterial effect.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Dynamic time–kill curves of florfenicol in combination with doxycycline against Riemerella anatipestifer.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Emax relationships for the three PK/PD parameters of florfenicol in combination with doxycycline vs. the antibacterial effect of different isolates.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gyuris É, Wehmann E, Czeibert K, Magyar T. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Riemerella anatipestifer strains isolated from geese and ducks in Hungary. Acta Vet Hung. (2017) 65:153–65. 10.1556/004.2017.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li T, Shan M, He J, Wang X, Wang S, Tian M, et al. . Riemerella anatipestifer M949_0459 gene is responsible for the bacterial resistance to tigecycline. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:96615–26. 10.18632/oncotarget.19633 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pathanasophon P, Phuektes P, Tanticharoenyos T, Narongsak W, Sawada T. A potential new serotype of Riemerella anatipestifer isolated from ducks in Thailand. Avian Pathol. (2002) 31:267–70. 10.1080/03079450220136576 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang CF, Lin WH, Yeh TM, Chiang TS, Chang YF. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Riemerella anatipestifer isolated from ducks and the efficacy of ceftiofur treatment. J Vet Diagn Invest. (2003) 15:26–9. 10.1177/104063870301500106 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qiu Z, Cao C, Qu Y, Lu Y, Sun M, Zhang Y, et al. . In vivo activity of cefquinome against Riemerella anatipestifer using the pericarditis model in the duck. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. (2016) 39:299–304. 10.1111/jvp.12271 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources