Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 15:2022:9661408.
doi: 10.1155/2022/9661408. eCollection 2022.

Effect of IMB Model Combined with Spousal Support Breastfeeding Intervention on PBSES Score and Breastfeeding Rate of Primipara with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Shaoping Chen  1   2 , Linxian Li  1   2 , Qianwen Sun  1   2 , Shulan Chen  1   2 , Jing Cheng  1   2 , Siqi Xiong  1   2
Affiliations

Effect of IMB Model Combined with Spousal Support Breastfeeding Intervention on PBSES Score and Breastfeeding Rate of Primipara with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Shaoping Chen et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Retraction in

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effects of the info-motivation-behavior skills (IMB) model combined with spousal support breastfeeding intervention on breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (PBSES) scores and breastfeeding rate of primiparas with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Methods: Seventy-four first-term pregnant women and 74 of their spouses were selected as the traditional control group by the convenience sampling method from July to September 2021 in obstetrics department of Shenzhen Third People's Hospital. 74 pregnant women with their first child and 74 spouses who had their first child checked during October to December 2021 were classified as the IMB model group. The traditional control group was applied with conventional intervention management mode, and the IMB model group was applied with intervention management mode based on IMB theory on the basis of the traditional control group. The self-efficacy scores of breastfeeding before and after intervention during pregnancy and during hospitalization were compared between the two groups, and the self-efficacy scores of paternal support for breastfeeding were compared. The exclusive breastfeeding rate of infants within 6 months and the maternal breastfeeding knowledge level of the two groups were compared, and the correlation between maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy score and feeding knowledge level was analyzed.

Results: After pregnancy intervention, PBSES and FBSES-SF scores were significantly increased in both groups, and scores of scales in the IMB model group increased significantly than the traditional control group (all P < 0.05). The BSES-SF and FBSES-SF scores of the IMB model group increased significantly than the traditional control group at 3 days after delivery and at discharge (P < 0.05), and the scores of each scale at discharge in both groups increased significantly than those at 3 days after delivery (P < 0.05). The rate of exclusive breastfeeding in the IMB model group was 94.59% (70/74), and that in the traditional control group was 78.38% (58/74). There was a significant difference (χ2 = 8.325, P = 0.004). At discharge, the score of maternal breastfeeding knowledge increased significantly in both groups, and the score of the IMB model group increased significantly than that of the traditional control group (all P < 0.05). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between PBSES score, FBSES-SF score, and maternal feeding knowledge level, which showed positive correlation (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The self-efficacy of prenatal breastfeeding in pregnant women with HBV is low, and the application of the IMB model combined with the intervention mode of spy-supported breastfeeding has positive effects on the improvement of maternal breastfeeding efficiency, breastfeeding health knowledge level, and postpartum breastfeeding rate, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between PBSES score and breastfeeding knowledge score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between BSES-SF score and breastfeeding knowledge score.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ickes S. B., Oddo V. M., Sanders H. K., et al. Formal maternal employment is associated with lower odds of exclusive breastfeeding by 14 weeks postpartum: a cross-sectional survey in Naivasha, Kenya. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition . 2021;113(3):562–573. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa351. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miranda G. D. S., de Lima T. A. L., de Oliveira Costermani H., et al. Breastfeeding undernutrition changes iBAT-involved thermogenesis protein expression and leads to a lean phenotype in adult rat offspring. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry . 2021;99, article 108857 doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2021.108857. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dieterich R., Chang J., Danford C., Scott P. W., Wend C., Demirci J. The relationship between internalized weight stigma during pregnancy and breastfeeding: a prospective longitudinal study. Obesity . 2021;29(5):919–927. doi: 10.1002/oby.23139. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO. 10 facts on breastfeeding [EB/OL] Journal of eugenics in China; 2017.
    1. WHO. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: report of the expert consultation [EB/OL] . 2020

Publication types