Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 23;49(5):683-688.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756346. eCollection 2022 Sep.

The Great Saphenous Vein-An Underrated Recipient Vein in Free Flap Plasty for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Retrospective Monocenter Study

Affiliations

The Great Saphenous Vein-An Underrated Recipient Vein in Free Flap Plasty for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Retrospective Monocenter Study

Abdulwares Meiwandi et al. Arch Plast Surg. .

Abstract

Background Reconstruction of large soft tissue defects of the lower extremity often requires the use of free flaps. The main limiting factor and potential for complications lie in the selection of proper donor and recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis. While the superficial veins of the lower leg are easier to dissect, they are thought to be more vulnerable to trauma and lead to a higher complication rate when using them instead of the deep accompanying veins as recipient vessels. No clear evidence exists that proves this concept. Methods We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 97 patients who underwent free flap plasty to reconstruct predominantly traumatic defects of the lower extremity at our institute. The most used flap was the gracilis muscle flap. We divided the population into three groups based on the recipient veins that were used for microvascular anastomosis and compared their outcomes. The primary outcome was the major complication rate. Results Overall flap survivability was 93.81%. The complication rates were not higher when using the great saphenous vein as a recipient vessel when comparing to utilizing the deep concomitant veins alone or the great saphenous vein in combination to the concomitant veins. Conclusions In free flap surgery of the lower extremity, the selection of the recipient veins should not be restricted to the deep accompanying veins of the main vessels. The superficial veins, especially the great saphenous vein, offer an underrated option when performing free flap reconstruction.

Keywords: free tissue flaps; lower extremity; microsurgery; reconstructive surgical procedures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Free flap reconstruction after open tibial fracture (Gustillo's type 3b) with bone and soft tissue defect. ( A ) Intraoperative photograph of a 74-year-old female patient with a traumatic defect at the right medial distal lower leg. ( B ) Intraoperative photograph of the recipient vessels. ( C ) Intraoperative photograph after insertion of a TMG flap. ( D ) Photograph at follow-up after 2 weeks postoperatively. GSV, great saphenous vein; PTA, posterior tibial artery; PTV, posterior tibial vein.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gorman P W, Barnes C L, Fischer T J, McAndrew M P, Moore M M. Soft-tissue reconstruction in severe lower extremity trauma. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(243):57–64. - PubMed
    1. Engel H, Lin C H, Wei F C. Role of microsurgery in lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127 01:228S–238S. - PubMed
    1. Tomaino M, Bowen V. Reconstructive surgery for lower limb salvage. Can J Surg. 1995;38(03):221–228. - PubMed
    1. Yazar S, Lin C H, Wei F C. One-stage reconstruction of composite bone and soft-tissue defects in traumatic lower extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(06):1457–1466. - PubMed
    1. Khouri R K, Shaw W W. Reconstruction of the lower extremity with microvascular free flaps: a 10-year experience with 304 consecutive cases. J Trauma. 1989;29(08):1086–1094. - PubMed