A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting Content on TikTok
- PMID: 36159384
- PMCID: PMC9507595
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756296
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Breast Reconstruction with Fat Grafting Content on TikTok
Abstract
As of November 2021, TikTok has one billion monthly active users and is recognized as the most engaging social media platform. TikTok has seen a surge in users and content creators, ranging from athletes to medical professionals. In the past year, content creators have utilized the app to advocate for social reforms, education, and other uses that were not previously considered. Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, with an expected 281,550 new cases of invasive breast cancer in 2021. As more individuals with breast cancer choose to undergo resection, the demand for autologous fat grafting in breast reconstruction has increased due to the natural look and feel of breast tissue. The purpose of this article is to analyze content related to breast reconstruction with fat grafting found on TikTok and recommend methods to improve patient education, care, and outcomes. We searched TikTok on November 1, 2021, for videos using the phrase "breast reconstruction with fat grafting." The top 200 videos retrieved from the TikTok search algorithm were analyzed, and all commentaries, duplicates, and nonrelevant videos were removed. Video characteristics were collected, and two independent reviewers generated a DISCERN score A total of 131 videos were included in the study. They were found to have a combined 1,871,980 likes, 41,113 comments, and 58,662 shares. The videos had an average DISCERN score of 2.16. Content creators had an overall low DISCERN score in items involving the use of references, disclosure of risks for not obtaining treatment, and support for shared decision-making. When stratified, the DISCERN score was higher for videos created by physicians (DISCERN average 2.48) than for videos created by nonphysicians (DISCERN average 1.99; p < 0.001). Content creators can improve the quality of their videos by disclosing treatment risks, benefits and risks, discussing risks for not obtaining treatment, and advocating for shared decision-making. Furthermore, including citations and academic references may offer increased credibility and promote evidence practice. This article is limited by the variability seen on the TikTok platform that is influenced by algorithmic trends. The top 200 search results vary, making each compilation of videos selected for analysis unique. Furthermore, although DISCERN is a reliable source to assess patient information, it has not been tested for its reliability with videos such as on TikTok. Despite TikTok being developed as a social media platform, it has shown to be a medium for patient outreach and an educational tool.
Keywords: breast cancer; breast reconstruction; fat grafting.
The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok.AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jun 12;4(3):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100364. eCollection 2024 Aug. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024. PMID: 39077679 Free PMC article.
-
Current Public Trends in the Discussion of Dry Eyes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular Content on TikTok.Cureus. 2022 Feb 28;14(2):e22702. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22702. eCollection 2022 Feb. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35386165 Free PMC article.
-
TikTok: An Opportunity for Antibiotic Education?Innov Pharm. 2022 Dec 26;13(4):10.24926/iip.v13i4.4916. doi: 10.24926/iip.v13i4.4916. eCollection 2022. Innov Pharm. 2022. PMID: 37305589 Free PMC article.
-
#Neurosurgery: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Neurosurgical Content on TikTok.World Neurosurg X. 2022 Sep 9;17:100137. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100137. eCollection 2023 Jan. World Neurosurg X. 2022. PMID: 36204176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Discourse Surrounding Polycystic Ovary Syndrome on TikTok: A Social Media Analysis.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 12;12(22):2253. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12222253. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39595451 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
An analysis of oral contraceptive related videos on TikTok.AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jun 12;4(3):100364. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100364. eCollection 2024 Aug. AJOG Glob Rep. 2024. PMID: 39077679 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating HPV Vaccination-Related Content on a Burgeoning Social Media Platform: Insufficient Quality of TikTok.OTO Open. 2024 Dec 15;8(4):e70052. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70052. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec. OTO Open. 2024. PMID: 39678371 Free PMC article.
-
Myopia information on TikTok: analysis factors that impact video quality and audience engagement.BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 29;24(1):1194. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18687-4. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38685020 Free PMC article.
-
Is This the Right Link? How TikTok Views Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 19. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17858-w. Online ahead of print. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40684016
-
TikTok in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Its Uses.Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Sep 1;5:ojad081. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad081. eCollection 2023. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023. PMID: 37868688 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- TikTok User Statistics . Published October 11, 2021. Accessed November 6, 2021, at:https://backlinko.com/tiktok-users
-
- U.S. Breast Cancer Statistics Breastcancer.orgPublished February 4, 2021. Accessed November 6, 2021, at:https://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics
-
- Rees C E, Ford J E, Sheard C E. Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;47(03):273–275. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous