Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 16;10(26):9254-9263.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9254.

Local inflammatory response to gastroesophageal reflux: Association of gene expression of inflammatory cytokines with esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH data

Affiliations

Local inflammatory response to gastroesophageal reflux: Association of gene expression of inflammatory cytokines with esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH data

Sergey Morozov et al. World J Clin Cases. .

Abstract

Background: Gene expression of inflammatory cytokines may take part in the pathophysiology of different forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Aim: To explore gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in esophageal mucosa in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) and non-erosive forms of GERD (NERD) and its association with data of esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) measurements.

Methods: This was a single-center prospective study. Esophageal mucosa samples were taken from the lower part of the esophagus during endoscopy. Expression of interleukin (IL)-, IL-10, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFA), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), differentiation cluster 68 (CD68) and β-2 microglobulin genes in esophageal mucosa was assessed with ImmunoQuantex assays. MII-pH measurements were performed on all the participants. Diagnosis of GERD was confirmed by the results of the MII-pH data. Based on the endoscopy, patients were allocated to the groups of EE and NERD. The control group consisted of non-symptomatic subjects with normal endoscopy and MII-pH results. We used nonparametric statistics to compare the differences between the groups. Association of expression of the mentioned genes with the results of the MII-pH data was assessed with Spearman's rank method.

Results: Data from 60 patients with GERD and 10 subjects of the control group were available for the analysis. Higher expression of IL-18 (5.89 ± 0.4 vs 5.28 ± 1.1, P = 0.04) and GATA3 (2.92 ± 0.86 vs 2.23 ± 0.96, P = 0.03) was found in the EE group compared to NERD. Expression of IL-1β, IL-18, TNFA, and TLR4 was lower (P < 0.05) in the control group compared to EE and NERD. Esophageal acid exposure correlated with the expression of IL-1β (Spearman's rank r = 0.29), IL-18 (r = 0.31), TNFA (r = 0.35), GATA3 (r = 0.34), TLR4 (r = 0.29), and CD68 (r = 0.37). Mean esophageal рН correlated inversely with the expression of IL-18, TNFA, GATA3, TLR4, and CD68. No association of gene expression with the number of gastroesophageal refluxes was found.

Conclusion: In patients with EE, local expression of IL-18 and GATA3 was higher compared to subjects with NERD. Esophageal acid exposure correlated directly with expression of IL-1β, IL-18, TNFA, TLR4, CD68, and β-2 microglobulin genes. Inverse correlation was revealed between expression of IL-18, TNFA, GATA3, TLR4, and CD68 and mean esophageal pH.

Keywords: Cytokines; Erosive esophagitis; Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH; Gastroesophageal reflux; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Gene expression; Non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Dr. Morozov reports grants from Russian Science Foundation, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from AlfaSigma, non-financial support from Laborie, personal fees from DrFalk, personal fees from Takeda, from Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design, subject flow, and allocation chart. GERD: Gastroesophageal reflux disease; IL-1β: Interleukin-1β; IL-10: Interleukin-10; IL-18: Interleukin-18; TNFA: Tumor necrosis factor α; TLR4: Toll-like receptor 4; GATA3: GATA binding protein 3; CD68: Differentiation cluster 68; B2M: β-2 microglobulin; MII-pH: Esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1900–20; quiz 1943. - PubMed
    1. Iwakiri K, Fujiwara Y, Manabe N, Ihara E, Kuribayashi S, Akiyama J, Kondo T, Yamashita H, Ishimura N, Kitasako Y, Iijima K, Koike T, Omura N, Nomura T, Kawamura O, Ohara S, Ozawa S, Kinoshita Y, Mochida S, Enomoto N, Shimosegawa T, Koike K. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2022;57:267–285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mastracci L, Grillo F, Parente P, Unti E, Battista S, Spaggiari P, Campora M, Scaglione G, Fassan M, Fiocca R. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus: an overview with an histologic diagnostic approach. Pathologica. 2020;112:117–127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasyap AK, Sah SK, Chaudhary S. Clinical spectrum and risk factors associated with asymptomatic erosive esophagitis as determined by Los Angeles classification: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0192739. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katzka DA, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Where Rome, Lyon, and Montreal Meet. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:767–776. - PMC - PubMed