Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022;9(4):575-588.
doi: 10.1007/s40429-022-00440-9. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Association of Cyberbullying and Internet Use Disorder

Affiliations
Review

Association of Cyberbullying and Internet Use Disorder

Georgios Floros et al. Curr Addict Rep. 2022.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review is to critically assess the published studies on the relationship between cyberbullying and internet use disorder (IUD), and propose directions for further study.

Recent findings: There were only four prospective studies out of thirty-two reviewed studies conducted since 2004, with only one prospective study conducted during the past 5 years. The field of study has been stagnant during the past 5 years with the vast majority of studies conducted on primary or secondary education and failing to address cyberbullying and IUD in social media and online gaming.

Summary: Cyberbullying and IUD have been described since the nineties, yet there are still significant issues with their definition and research. Lately, both these problematic behaviors are sharing the same environments in social media and online gaming. This critical appraisal of published research examined thirty-two published peer-reviewed studies carried out since 2004. Findings indicate a number of significant issues including an overreliance on cross-sectional study design, near-exclusive focus on primary and secondary education students, widespread employment of unstandardized measures for cyberbullying and IUD, and lack of assessment for objective measures of psychological distress. Directions for future research are offered.

Keywords: Cyberbullying; Internet gaming disorder; Internet use disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart of study selection

References

    1. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Cyberbullying research summary. Dev Psychol. 1998;34(2):299–309. - PubMed
    1. Zhu C, Huang S, Evans R, Zhang W. Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: a comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Front Public Health. 2021;9:634909. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stevens F, Nurse JRC, Arief B. Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: a systematic review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(6):367–376. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0253. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(3):277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014. - DOI
    1. Watts LK, Wagner J, Velasquez B, Behrens PI. Cyberbullying in higher education: a literature review. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;69:268–274. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.038. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources