Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep 16:1-16.
doi: 10.1007/s10209-022-00917-4. Online ahead of print.

Learning features and accessibility limitations of video conferencing applications: are people with visual impairment left behind

Iyad Abu Doush  1   2 , Ahmad Al-Jarrah  3 , Nancy Alajarmeh  4 , Mrim Alnfiai  5
Affiliations

Learning features and accessibility limitations of video conferencing applications: are people with visual impairment left behind

Iyad Abu Doush et al. Univers Access Inf Soc. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic increases the reliance on video conferencing applications for learning. Accessible video conferencing applications with good learning features can help people with visual impairment when they participate in online classes. This paper investigates the accessibility limitations and the available learning features of the top two current video conferencing applications, namely Zoom and MS Teams. A task-based expert review and a blind user evaluation are conducted using Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1. In addition, the study identifies the application with the better learning features based on Universal Design for Learning guidelines. A set of recommendations are outlined for developing better inclusive video conferencing applications for people with visual impairment. The presented ideas can be applied to enhance the learning experience of people with visual impairment.

Keywords: Accessibility; E-learning accessibility; Learning features; Universal design for learning; Video conferencing; Web content accessibility guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Zoom annotations on the shared MS Word
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Zoom shared whiteboard with text
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Zoom reactions when selecting more
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
MS Teams chat interactions
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
MS Teams share window with desktop and window
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Huss, A.J., Eastep, S.: Okay, our courses are online, but are they ada compliant? an investigation of faculty awareness of accessibility at a midwestern university. Inq. Educ. 8(2) (2016). http://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol8/iss2/2
    1. Abu-Doush I, Bany-Mohammed A, Ali E, Al-Betar MA. Towards a more accessible e-government in jordan: an evaluation study of visually impaired users and web developers. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2013;32(3):273–293. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2011.630416. - DOI
    1. Acosta-Vargas, P., Guaña-Moya, J., Acosta-Vargas, G., Villegas-Ch, W., Salvador-Ullauri, L.: Method for assessing accessibility in videoconference systems. In: International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration, pp. 669–675. Springer (2021)
    1. Adams D, Simpson K, Davies L, Campbell C, Macdonald L. Online learning for university students on the autism spectrum: a systematic review and questionnaire study. Australasian J. Educ. Technol. 2019;35(6):111–131. doi: 10.14742/ajet.5483. - DOI
    1. Al-Jarrah, A.: Development of collaborative virtual learning environments for enhancing deaf people’s learning in Jordan. In: Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference, pp. 1017–1028. Springer (2018)

LinkOut - more resources