Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jul;7(1):e001002.
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2022-001002.

Potential new fluoroquinolone treatments for suspected bacterial keratitis

Affiliations
Review

Potential new fluoroquinolone treatments for suspected bacterial keratitis

Rose Herbert et al. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Topical fluoroquinolones (FQs) are an established treatment for suspected microbial keratitis. An increased FQ resistance in some classes of bacterial pathogens is a concern. Some recently developed FQs have an extended spectrum of activity, making them a suitable alternative for topical ophthalmic use. For example, the new generation FQs, avarofloxacin, delafloxacin, finafloxacin, lascufloxacin, nadifloxacin, levonadifloxacin, nemonoxacin and zabofloxacin have good activity against the common ophthalmic pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae and several of the Enterobacteriaceae However, because there are no published ophthalmic break-point concentrations, the susceptibility of an isolated micro-organism to a topical FQ is extrapolated from systemic break-point data and wild type susceptibility. The purpose of this review is to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the FQs licensed for topical ophthalmic use with the same parameters for new generation FQs. We performed a literature review of the FQs approved for topical treatment and the new generation FQs licensed to treat systemic infections. We then compared the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of bacterial isolates and the published concentrations that FQs achieved in the cornea and aqueous. We also considered the potential suitability of new generation FQs for topical use based on their medicinal properties. Notably, we found significant variation in the reported corneal and aqueous FQ concentrations so that reliance on the reported mean concentration may not be appropriate, and the first quartile concentration may be more clinically relevant. The provision of the MIC for the microorganism together with the achieved lower (first) quartile concentration of a FQ in the cornea could inform management decisions such as whether to continue with the prescribed antimicrobial, increase the frequency of application, use a combination of antimicrobials or change treatment.

Keywords: Cornea; Infection; Pharmacology; Treatment Medical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The bicyclic core structure of fluoroquinolones. X and Y are carbon or nitrogen atoms. A carbon atom at Y defines the quinolones. Fluoroquinolones have a fluorine (F) atom at C6. Different substitutions at positions R1, R5, R7 and R8 can improve the activity of the drug. Adapted from Pham et al and Rusu et al
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structures of second, third and fourth generation fluoroquinolones. Molecular formula (MF), Molecular weight (MW in Daltons). A. Second generation fluoroquinolones. B. Third (levofloxacin and gatifloxacin) and fourth (moxifloxacin) generation fluoroquinolones
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structures of newest fluoroquinolones. Adapted from Rusu et al.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structures of tobramycin-ciprofloxacin and tobramycin-moxifloxacin hybrids. Re-drawn from Domalaon et al.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mechanism of action of fluoroquinolones. DNA gyrase blockade inhibits the supercoiling of bacterial DNA in gram-negative bacteria, while topoisomerase IV inhibition prevents the segregation of replicated DNA in gram-positive bacteria. Adapted from Rusu et al.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stapleton F. The epidemiology of infectious keratitis. Ocul Surf (Published Online First: 19 August 2021). - PubMed
    1. Song X, Xie L, Tan X, et al. . A multi-center, cross-sectional study on the burden of infectious keratitis in China. PLoS One 2014;9:e113843. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113843 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuft S, Somerville TF, Li J-PO, et al. . Bacterial keratitis: identifying the areas of clinical uncertainty. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021;101031:101031. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.101031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown L, Leck AK, Gichangi M, et al. . The global incidence and diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:e49–57. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30448-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bourcier T, Thomas F, Borderie V, et al. . Bacterial keratitis: predisposing factors, clinical and microbiological review of 300 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:834–8. 10.1136/bjo.87.7.834 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources