Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep:8:e2200217.
doi: 10.1200/GO.22.00217.

Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update

Affiliations
Review

Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: ASCO Resource-Stratified Guideline Update

Surendra S Shastri et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To update resource-stratified, evidence-based recommendations on secondary prevention of cervical cancer globally.

Methods: American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational Expert Panel to produce recommendations reflecting four resource-tiered settings. A review of existing guidelines, formal consensus-based process, and modified ADAPTE process to adapt existing guidelines was conducted. Other experts participated in formal consensus.

Results: This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous update. Five existing guidelines were identified and reviewed, and adapted recommendations form the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness analyses provided indirect evidence to inform consensus, which resulted in ≥ 75% agreement.

Recommendations: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is recommended in all resource settings; visual inspection with acetic acid may be used in basic settings. Recommended age ranges and frequencies vary by the following setting: maximal: age 25-65 years, every 5 years; enhanced: age 30-65 years, if two consecutive negative tests at 5-year intervals, then every 10 years; limited: age 30-49 years, every 10 years; basic: age 30-49 years, one to three times per lifetime. For basic settings, visual assessment is used to determine treatment eligibility; in other settings, genotyping with cytology or cytology alone is used to determine treatment. For basic settings, treatment is recommended if abnormal triage results are obtained; in other settings, abnormal triage results followed by colposcopy is recommended. For basic settings, treatment options are thermal ablation or loop electrosurgical excision procedure; for other settings, loop electrosurgical excision procedure or ablation is recommended; with a 12-month follow-up in all settings. Women who are HIV-positive should be screened with HPV testing after diagnosis, twice as many times per lifetime as the general population. Screening is recommended at 6 weeks postpartum in basic settings; in other settings, screening is recommended at 6 months. In basic settings without mass screening, infrastructure for HPV testing, diagnosis, and treatment should be developed.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/resource-stratified-guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Surendra S. ShastriThis author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Patty E. GravittResearch Funding: Cepheid (Inst) Dorothy C. LombeThis author is a member of the JCO Global Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Yin Ling WooHonoraria: Roche IndiaResearch Funding: COPAN (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Use of VIA versus use of VAT. VAT, visual assessment for treatment; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-49 in basic‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; VAT, visual assessment for treatment; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-49 in limited‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; VIA, visual inspection with acetic acid.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-65 in enhanced‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; QA, quality assurance.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Secondary prevention of cervical cancer for women age 30-65 in maximal‐resource settings. HPV, human papillomavirus; LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; QA, quality assurance.

References

    1. McDaniel CC, Hallam HH, Cadwallader T, et al. : Persistent racial disparities in cervical cancer screening with Pap test. Prev Med Rep 24:101652, 2021 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agenor M, Perez AE, Peitzmeier SM, et al. : Human papillomavirus vaccination initiation among sexual orientation identity and racial/ethnic subgroups of Black and White U.S. women and girls: An intersectional analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 27:1349-1358, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oladeru OT, Ma SJ, Miccio JA, et al. : Breast and cervical cancer screening disparities in transgender people. Am J Clin Oncol 45:116-121, 2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peitzmeier SM, Bernstein IM, McDowell MJ, et al. : Enacting power and constructing gender in cervical cancer screening encounters between transmasculine patients and health care providers. Cult Health Sex 22:1315-1332, 2020 - PMC - PubMed
    1. James SE, Herman JL, Rankin S: The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Washington, DC, National Center for Transgender Equality, 2016