Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Taiwanese Version of the Hospice Quality of Life Index
- PMID: 36162099
- DOI: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000911
Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Taiwanese Version of the Hospice Quality of Life Index
Abstract
Quality of life is an important outcome for people with cancer throughout their cancer trajectory. Having a valid and reliable instrument to measure the quality of life is critical. This cross-sectional study examined the psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Hospice Quality of Life Index among patients with advanced cancer in Taiwan. There were 3 phases: (1) translation of the Hospice Quality of Life Index from English to Mandarin, (2) pilot testing among 30 targeted participants, and (3) field testing to examine validity and reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original factor structure of the Hospice Quality of Life Index did not fit the data. After 5 items were deleted from the original questionnaire, principal factor extraction with oblique rotation for exploratory factor analysis yielded 3 subscales: Social/Spiritual Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, and Functional/Physiological Well-Being. For convergent validity, the small to moderate strength of associations showed shared variance with the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale. The internal consistency was supported by Cronbach α ranging from 0.77 to 0.86. This study shows early evidence that the quality of life of people with advanced cancer can be appropriately assessed by the Taiwanese Hospice Quality of Life Index.
Copyright © 2022 by The Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Health Promotion Administration. Palliative care. August 25, 2021. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=210 . Accessed June 15, 2022.
-
- Johnston B, Flemming K, Narayanasamy MJ, Coole C, Hardy B. Patient reported outcome measures for measuring dignity in palliative and end of life care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res . 2017;17(1):574. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2450-6. - DOI
-
- Hu WY, Dai YT, Berry D, Chiu TY. Psychometric testing of the translated McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Taiwan version in patients with terminal cancer. J Formos Med Assoc . 2003;102(2):97–104.
-
- Atkinson TM, Schwartz CE, Goldstein L, et al. Perceptions of response burden associated with completion of patient-reported outcome assessments in oncology. Value Health . 2019;22(2):225–230. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.875. - DOI
-
- Shih TC, Chang HT, Lin MH, Chen CK, Chen TJ, Hwang SJ. Differences in do-not-resuscitate orders, hospice care utilization, and late referral to hospice care between cancer and non-cancer decedents in a tertiary Hospital in Taiwan between 2010 and 2015: a hospital-based observational study. BMC Palliat Care . 2018;17(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12904-018-0271-y. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
