Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Nov:167:104863.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104863. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

Assess and validate predictive performance of models for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands comparing the value of registry data with high-granular electronic health records

Affiliations
Observational Study

Assess and validate predictive performance of models for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands comparing the value of registry data with high-granular electronic health records

Iacopo Vagliano et al. Int J Med Inform. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess, validate and compare the predictive performance of models for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) over two different waves of infections. Our models were built with high-granular Electronic Health Records (EHR) data versus less-granular registry data.

Methods: Observational study of all COVID-19 patients admitted to 19 Dutch ICUs participating in both the national quality registry National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) and the EHR-based Dutch Data Warehouse (hereafter EHR). Multiple models were developed on data from the first 24 h of ICU admissions from February to June 2020 (first COVID-19 wave) and validated on prospective patients admitted to the same ICUs between July and December 2020 (second COVID-19 wave). We assessed model discrimination, calibration, and the degree of relatedness between development and validation population. Coefficients were used to identify relevant risk factors.

Results: A total of 1533 patients from the EHR and 1563 from the registry were included. With high granular EHR data, the average AUROC was 0.69 (standard deviation of 0.05) for the internal validation, and the AUROC was 0.75 for the temporal validation. The registry model achieved an average AUROC of 0.76 (standard deviation of 0.05) in the internal validation and 0.77 in the temporal validation. In the EHR data, age, and respiratory-system related variables were the most important risk factors identified. In the NICE registry data, age and chronic respiratory insufficiency were the most important risk factors.

Conclusion: In our study, prognostic models built on less-granular but readily-available registry data had similar performance to models built on high-granular EHR data and showed similar transportability to a prospective COVID-19 population. Future research is needed to verify whether this finding can be confirmed for upcoming waves.

Keywords: Covid-19 [C01.748.610.763.500]; Critical care [E02.760.190]; Electronic Health Record [E05.318.308.940.968.625.500]; In-hospital mortality [E05.318.308.985.550.400]; Machine learning [G17.035.250.500]; Prognosis [E01.789].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Calibration curves of the REG and EHR models in the internal as well as temporal validations.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Coefficients of the EHR logistic regression model. PaCO2 is the partial pressure of carbon dioxide, FiO2 is the fraction of inspired oxygen. Supplementary Table S2 includes the model description.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Coefficients of the REG logistic regression model. Supplementary Table S3 includes the model description.

References

    1. L.B. Wynants, G.S. Van Calster, R.D. Collins, et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal, BMJ, 369: m1328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grasselli G., Greco M., Zanella A., et al. Risk Factors Associated With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units in Lombardy. Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3539. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Richardson S., Hirsch J.S., Narasimhan M., et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323:2052–2059. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6775. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karagiannidis C., Mostert C., Hentschker C., et al. Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:853–862. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30316-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fleuren L.M., de Bruin D.P., Tonutti M., Lalisang R.C.A., Elbers P.W.G. Dutch ICU Data Sharing Collaborators. Large-scale ICU data sharing for global collaboration: the first 1633 critically ill COVID-19 patients in the Dutch Data Warehouse. Intensive Care Med. 2021 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources