Acceptability of an intravaginal ring for simultaneously preventing HIV infection and pregnancy: Qualitative findings of the Kisumu Combined Ring Study, 2019
- PMID: 36162740
- PMCID: PMC11265295
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106935
Acceptability of an intravaginal ring for simultaneously preventing HIV infection and pregnancy: Qualitative findings of the Kisumu Combined Ring Study, 2019
Abstract
Multipurpose prevention technology intravaginal rings (MPT IVRs) may offer a promising solution for addressing women's multiple sexual and reproductive health needs. We describe MPT IVR acceptability perspectives and examine user experiences of 25 cisgender women aged 18-34 years enrolled in a phase IIa randomized, partially blinded, placebo-controlled evaluation of tenofovir-based IVRs with and without contraceptive co-formulation. All took part in an individual, audio-recorded, semi-structured qualitative interview. A thematic analysis of transcribed interviews was completed in MaxQDA. Participants shared little to no knowledge of or experience with IVRs prior to joining the study. Four MPT IVR themes were identified: physical well-being, method reliability, personal management, and societal endorsement. Commonly cited of concern, but less described as being experienced, were physical discomforts (e.g., painful insertion/removal; inability to carry out daily activities/chores; foreign body sensation; expulsion; sexual interference, or debilitating side effects). Uncertainty regarding efficacy influenced perspectives about intended prevention benefits. Personal choices in managing reproduction and sexual behaviors had to be congruent with sociocultural values and norms for acceptance beyond the individual user level. Participants viewed broader community acceptance as likely to be mixed given community opposition to the use of modern family planning methods. They also shared concerns that IVR use could lead to infertility, especially among nulliparous women, or that it would encourage premarital sex or high-risk sexual behaviors among adolescent and young women. While a MPT IVR may not be suitable for all women, first-hand testimonials could help influence collective receptivity. Additional community acceptability research is needed. Clinical Trial Registration The study is registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03762382.
Keywords: Acceptability; HIV prevention; Kenya; Multipurpose intravaginal rings; User experience; Women.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial conflicting interests statement
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Non-financial competing interests statement
The authors declare that they have no non-financial competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Coalition Advancing Multipurpose Innovations (CAMI), MPT Product Development Database, Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA, 2022. http://mpts101.org/mpt-database/mpts-gels. Accessed December 4, 2020.
-
- El-Sahn M, Lucas J, Aikenhead M, et al., Understanding the potential for multipurpose prevention of pregnancy and HIV: Results from surveys assessing four hypothetical concept profiles of multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) in Uganda, Nigeria and South Africa: AVAC: Global Advocacy for HIV Prevention. http://www.theimpt.org/documents/UnderstandingPotentialMPT-HIVpregnancy.pdf, 2016.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
