Improving survival from mechanical chest compression resuscitation

Affiliations

Wolfgang Lederer et al. Resusc Plus. 2022.

. 2022 Sep 15:11:100285.

doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100285. eCollection 2022 Sep.

¹ Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.

No abstract available

References

1. Azeli Y., Barbería E., Fernández A., García-Vilana S., Bardají A., Hardig B.M. Chest wall mechanics during mechanical chest compression and its relationship to CPR-related injuries and survival. Resuscitation Plus. 2022;10:100242. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100242. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Rubertsson S., Karlsten R. Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2005;65:357–363. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.12.006. - DOI - PubMed
1. Schwaiger D., Zanvettor A., Neumayr A., Baubin M.A. Add-on-LUCAS2™-Reanimation am NEF Innsbruck [Add-on-LUCAS2™ resuscitation at NEF Innsbruck] Anaesthesist. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01112-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Wagner H., Madsen Hardig B., Steen S., Sjoberg T., Harnek J., Olivecrona G.K. Evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest compressions in a porcine model. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-11-73. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Gaessler H., Kurka L., Rauch S., Seewald S., Kulla M., Fischer M. Mechanical chest compression devices under special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.06.014. - DOI - PubMed