Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;32(4):100998.
doi: 10.1016/j.oto.2022.100998. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

Life Cycle Assessment in Orthopedics

Bella Pollice  1 , Cassandra L Thiel  1 , Mark E Baratz  2
Affiliations

Life Cycle Assessment in Orthopedics

Bella Pollice et al. Oper Tech Orthop. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Covid-19 has led to an increase in the use of PPE, gowns, masks, sanitizers, air circulators, and much more, all contributing to an increase in medical waste. Waste generation is one issue. Emissions are another. The two are linked because waste and emissions are both indicators of consumption. However, waste is not the biggest driver of environmental emissions for healthcare. It is the production of medical equipment, particularly disposables that have a bigger impact. Energy use during care, including heating and cooling our facilities, is another. Environmental emissions like greenhouse gases may not correlate with waste generation, especially if the waste is plastic. Carbon is stored in plastic. Unless you're burning plastic, you're not emitting carbon. Healthcare has a waste issue and healthcare has an emissions issue. They are not necessarily the same thing, however, the strategies to mitigate each overlap. Life cycle assessment quantifies emissions from the creation to disposal of medical supplies. This allows the medical community to make informed choices with respect to the methods and materials that are used in providing care. As other specialties take the lead in reducing their environmental footprint, so too, must orthopedic surgery.

Keywords: Assessment; Life Cycle; Operating Room; Orthopedics; Waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. H Scott Matthews, Chris T Hendrickson, and Deanna Matthews: Life Cycle Assessment: Quantitative Approaches for Decisions that Matter, Open access textbook, 2014.
    1. Drew J, Christie SD, Tyedmers P, et al. Operating in a climate crisis: A state-of-the-science review of life cycle assessment within surgical and anesthetic care. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129(7):76001. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee K.-M, Inaba A. Center for Ecodesign and LCA(CEL), Ajou University; Suwon, Korea: 2014. Life Cycle Assessment: Best Practices of Iso 14040 Series.
    1. Hendrickson C.T., Horvath A, Joshi S, et al. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE-1997. 1997. Comparing two life cycle assessment approaches: A process model vs. economic input-output-based assessment; pp. 176–181.
    1. McGain F, McAlister S, McGavin A. Story D. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1073–1080. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources