Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;12(11):2563-2573.
doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00817-8. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency for Treatment of Lower Facial Laxity in Asians

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency for Treatment of Lower Facial Laxity in Asians

Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) is a valuable modality for tightening and contouring mild-to-moderate facial skin laxity. Few studies have evaluated new-generation MRF devices for lower facial laxity in Asians. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRF for treating lower facial laxity in Asians.

Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 30 volunteers with Fitzpatrick Skin Types III-V and mild-to-moderate skin laxity. Subjects received a single MRF treatment. Self-assessments and adverse events were recorded. Two blinded dermatologists graded improvements (6-point scale) after treatment and 1, 3, and 6 months later.

Results: All subjects completed the study. Treatment energy levels ranged from 2 to 4. The average number of shots was 412 ± 49, delivered in 3-4 passes with 15-30% overlap. All patients reported improvement in lower facial laxity immediately after treatment. Most patients had mild-to-moderate improvement over the 6-month follow-up. Continuous improvement was observed at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups (P < 0.01). Significant improvement was seen at the 6-month follow-up compared with the 1-month follow-up (P < 0.01). Subjects tolerated the procedure well: the average pain score was 3.13 out of 10, and no serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: The new-generation MRF device we tested was effective and safe for mild-to-moderate lower facial laxity in Asian skin. The latest MRF technology offers improved safety to prevent complications. Appropriate patient selection, setting, and protocols are mandatory to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.

The trial registration number: TCTR20210326002.

Keywords: Asians; Lower facial laxity; Monopolar radiofrequency; Skin tightening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Dermatologists’ assessments of the improvements immediately after the treatments, and 1, 3, and 6 months following the treatments
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patients’ assessments of the improvements immediately after the treatments, and 1, 3, and 6 months following the treatments
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A representative clinical photograph at baseline (A); immediately after the treatment (B); and 1 (C), 3 (D), and 6 (E) months after the treatment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carruthers J, Carruthers A. A multimodal approach to rejuvenation of the lower face. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:S89–S93. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000749. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angra K, Alhaddad M, Boen M, Lipp MB, Kollipara R, Hoss E, et al. Prospective clinical trial of the latest generation of noninvasive monopolar radiofrequency for the treatment of facial and upper neck skin laxity. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(6):762–766. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rabe JH, Mamelak AJ, McElgunn PJ, Morison WL, Sauder DN. Photoaging: mechanisms and repair. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee C, Gold MH. Updates on radiofrequency devices for skin tightening and body contouring. Dermatol Rev. 2020;1(3):75–83. doi: 10.1002/der2.31. - DOI
    1. Alster TS, Tanzi E. Improvement of neck and cheek laxity with a nonablative radiofrequency device: a lifting experience. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(4):503–507. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources