Endovascular treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective multicentric study
- PMID: 36167883
- DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01536-y
Endovascular treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective multicentric study
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the role of Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) to treat cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) using different embolic materials, focusing on its clinical and technical success rates; the association of UAE with methotrexate (MTX) and/or dilatation & curettage (D&C) was evaluated also.
Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis 33 patients (mean age 35 years) affected by CSP and treated with UAE from March 2012 to 2020 was performed. Dynamic levels of serum β-HCG have been collected until they decreased to normal values after procedures. For the statistical analysis the sample was divided into 2 groups: UAE versus UAE + MTX.
Results: The gestational sac age ranged between 5 and 13 weeks (mean 7 weeks). According to operator's preference, 11 patients (33.33%) were treated with sponge injection, 2 patients (6.06%) with a combination of sponge and microsphere the remaining 20 patients (60.60%) with microspheres alone. No major complications occurred after UAE and D&C, neither side effects related to the MTX administration. Technical and clinical success rates were 97% and 85%, respectively. Mean percentage of β-HCG reduction was 90% (range - 99.92 to + 7.98%). Statistical analysis with linear regression shows a R2 value of 0.9624 in UAE group while a R2 value of 0.9440 in UAE + MTX group with statistical significance (p < 0.0001). No significative differences were found between the two groups about clinical success rate and embolic material adopted.
Conclusion: In this series UAE has been found to be safe and effective for the treatment of CSP.
Keywords: Angiography; Dilation and curettage; Ectopic pregnancy; Scar pregnacy; Ultrasound; Uterine artery embolization.
© 2022. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.
References
-
- Petersen KB, Hoffmann E, Larsen CR, Nielsen HS (2016) Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril 105(4):958–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.130 - DOI
-
- Grechukhina O, Deshmukh U, Fan L, Kohari K et al (2018) Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence. Obstet Gynecol 132:1285–1295 - DOI
-
- Elmokadem AH, Abdel-Wahab RM, El-Zayadi AA et al (2019) Uterine artery embolization and methotrexate infusion as sole management for caesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies: a single-center experience and literature review. Can Assoc Radiol J 70:307–316 - DOI
-
- Nawroth F, Foth D, Wilhelm L et al (2001) Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar with methotrexate: a case report. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 99(1):135–137 - DOI
-
- Kanat-Pektas M, Bodur S, Dundar O et al (2016) Systematic review: what is the best first-line approach for cesarean section ectopic pregnancy? Taiwan J Obstetr Gynecol 55:263–269 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
