Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;70(12):3610-3619.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.18031. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

Feasibility of implementing a telephone-based frailty assessment

Affiliations

Feasibility of implementing a telephone-based frailty assessment

Stephanie Denise M Sison et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing literature on the importance of identifying and managing frailty, its assessment has been limited in clinical settings. With the goal of integrating frailty assessment into routine clinical practice, this quality improvement project aimed to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of administering a telephone-based frailty assessment.

Methods: Between 9/2020 and 6/2021, we identified 169 established patients with serious illnesses in an academic primary care-geriatric clinic. Patients were contacted via telephone, and their current medical, functional, nutritional, cognitive, and mood statuses were assessed using validated screening tools. A deficit-accumulation frailty score was then calculated using an electronic medical record-based frailty index calculator and standardized documentation with recommendations was generated for providers. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as the proportion of patients successfully assessed. Secondary outcomes included completion rates of each domain, administration time, providers' perception, and clinical utility of the assessment.

Results: A total of 139 (82.2%) patients, mean age of 82 years, 63.3% frail were successfully assessed. Of the 139 assessments, medical and functional domains were completed for all, while nutrition, mood, and cognition were completed by 88.5% (n = 123), 68.3% (n = 95), and 59.7% (n = 83) of the time, respectively. Conducting the full assessment took an average (standard deviation) time of 26.1 (7.3) minutes. Without the cognitive and mood domain, assessment took an average of 15.7 (7.5) minutes. Patients' providers found the information from the assessment helpful in evaluating and managing their patients. Care plans of 51.8% and 65.0% of patients who had mobility and mind issues, respectively, addressed these domains within 30 days after the assessment.

Conclusion: Implementation of the telephone-based frailty assessment is feasible, acceptable, and has the potential to influence the care plans of older adults. This work demonstrated how frailty assessment can be integrated with the outpatient setting.

Keywords: feasibility; implementation; multidomain assessment; outpatient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Dr. Kim has been supported by grants R01AG056368, R01AG071809, R01AG062713, and R21AG060227 from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health for unrelated work. He receives personal fees from Alosa Health and VillageMD.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Screenshots of the frailty index calculator embedded on the electronic medical record.
(A) Mock patient’s information is shown. The frailty index input form is automatically prefilled with the latest information available in the electronic medical record. It can also be updated/modified by the assessor. (B) The calculator will generate a report that shows the frailty index score and domain-specific impairments contributing to frailty, as well as the patient’s frailty index score against reference values in the general population.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Feasibility of conducting the telephone-based frailty assessment and completion rate per domain.
(A) Of the 169 eligible patients we identified and attempted to contact, 139 (82.2%) patients were successfully assessed. (B) Completion rate of each health domain included in the telephone-based frailty assessment are shown for the 139 patients who underwent the assessment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Results of the survey pertaining to the utility of the telephone-based frailty assessment.
Five providers, whose patients underwent the assessment, received this survey. Their responses (n=5) to the 10 Likert scale questions regarding the helpfulness and utility of the assessment are shown.

References

    1. Fried LP, Xue QL, Cappola AR, et al. Nonlinear multisystem physiological dysregulation associated with frailty in older women: implications for etiology and treatment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009;64(10):1049–1057. doi:10.1093/gerona/glp076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sc 2001;56(3):M146–156. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rockwood K, Howlett SE, MacKnight C, et al. Prevalence, attributes, and outcomes of fitness and frailty in community-dwelling older adults: report from the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2004;59(12):1310–1317. doi:10.1093/gerona/59.12.1310 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Figueroa JF, Joynt Maddox KE, Beaulieu N, Wild RC, Jha AK. Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study. Ann Intern Med 2017;167(10):706. doi:10.7326/M17-0767 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benetos A, Labat C, Rossignol P, et al. Treatment With Multiple Blood Pressure Medications, Achieved Blood Pressure, and Mortality in Older Nursing Home Residents: The PARTAGE Study. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175(6):989–995. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8012 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types